A CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURE ANALYSIS IN “THE WENDY WILLIAMS SHOW” SELECTED EPISODES

Authors

  • Laksmy Ady Kusumoriny Universitas Pamulang
  • Setiana Sri Wahyuni Sitepu Universitas Pamulang
  • Nahoras Bona Simarmata Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v4i1.19176

Keywords:

particularized and generalized conversational implicature, talk show.

Abstract

Implicature is one of pragmatics branches which has an interesting subject to learn. It is also known by conversational implicature. This study identifies two types of conversational implicature and the implicit meanings in The Wendy Williams Show. The data were identified and analyzed from the guest’s and the host’s utterances in the Wendy Williams Show. The collected data were identified and analyzed by the writers using Grice (1975) theory.  This study used qualitative method as a research method. The writers took 23 episodes, and in each episode, there were 1 up to 4 utterances contained implicit meanings. As a result of the study, it was found that there are 29 particularized conversational implicature and 21 generalized conversational implicature from 50 utterances were taken from The Wendy Williams Show. From the analysis it can be concluded that every utterance has different context in delivering messages which contains the implied meaning.

References

Aitchiston, J. (2010). Linguistics. London.

Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Dayanthi, E. (2017). An Analysis of Conversational Implicature in TIME Magazine's Interview with Donald Trump. Jakarta: The State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Halim, S. (2017). An Analysis of Conversational Implicature Used in the Flash TV Series by Greg Berlanti, Andrew Kreisberg, and Geoff Johns. Tangerang Selatan: Pamulang University.

Leedy, P., & Ormrod, J. (2001). Practical research: Planning and design (7th ed.) . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). PRAGMATICS. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Levinson, S. C. (1992). Pragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Levinson, S. C., & Sarah. (2000). Pragmatics Analysis. London: Longman.

Meyer, C. F. (2009). Introducing English Linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Nasution, S. S., Karimah, L. J., Sitepu, S. S. W., Tryana, L. A. K., & Kusumoriny, L. A. Slang Words in Me, and Earl, and The Dying Girl Novel: Type and Interpretation. Eralingua: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing dan Sastra, 5(1), 208-221.

Noro, Ken (1979) Generalized conversational implicature. Sophia Linguistica

Pranoto, R. E. (2013). Implicature Analysis in Maher Zain's Song Lyrics on Forgive Me Album. Malang: Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University.

Sadock, J. (1978). On testing for conversational implicature. In Peter Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics Volume 9. Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.

The Wendy Williams Show (n.d.). Retrieved October Saturday, 2017, from https://m.youtube.com/user/WendyWilliamsShow.

Yule. G. (2010). The Study of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-13

Issue

Section

Articles