THE SPEECH ACTS IN ENGLISH FOR YOUNG LEARNERS CLASS DURING VIRTUAL INSTRUCTIONAL-PRACTICES

Authors

  • Nur Najibah Sukmawati Universitas Pamulang
  • Sukma Septian Nasution Universitas Pamulang
  • Purwanti Taman Universitas Pamulang
  • Prihatin Puji Astuti Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v4i2.22366

Keywords:

Speech act, Pragmatic, English teaching and learning, Descriptive Qualitative Method

Abstract

Mode, as one of elements of context, can influence speech acts. Virtual meeting, as one of modes that signifies the absence of direct interaction potentially influences the speech acts too. This study aims at identifying speech acts in the instructional practices at selected elementary schools in South Tangerang, Banten to answer (1) what types of speech acts used by teachers and students of each school and (2) what factors influence the chosen speech acts. This is a content analysis that explores communication occurrences between teachers and young learners in English classes. Three pre-schools in Pamulang district were chosen as sources of data. The data were collected by recording their communication practices in three consecutive meetings. In total, there are nine communication practices from all the pre-schools. Then, the data were transcribed and segmented by clausal units to identify types of speech acts produced by each party. The findings show that every school performs similar patterns of speech acts dominated by the use of directive expression to maintain the students’ engagement, followed by declarative expression to stimulate the students’ active participation in various activities during the virtual instructional practices.

References

Azhari, A. S. (2018). Speech acts of classroom interaction. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture (IJLLC), 4(2), 24-45.Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. In Hickman, S. (2000). Social Significance of Pattern of Questioning in Classroom Discourse.

Basra, S., & Thoyyibah, L. (2017). A speech act analysis of teacher talk in an EFL classroom. International Journal of Education, 10(1), 73-81.

Davarzani, F., & Talebzadeh, H. (2020). The effect of Virtual and Real Classroom Instruction on Inter-language Pragmatic Development: Microblogging versus Traditional Instruction of Speech Acts to Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 13(27), 72-99.

Denzin N. And Lincoln Y. (eds.) (2000). Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publication Inc.

Griffiths, P. (2006). An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics.

Grundlingh, L. (2018). Memes as speech acts. Social Semiotics, 28(2), 147-168.

Heuzeroth, J., & Budke, A. (2020). The Effects of Multilinguality on the Development of Causal Speech Acts in the Geography Classroom. Education Sciences, 10(11), 299.

Huangfu, W. (2012). Cross-cultural comparisons of English request speech acts in native speakers of English and Chinese. Cross-Cultural Communication, 8(4), 24-29.

Juvrianto, C. J. (2018). Speech acts in EFL classroom at Islamic senior high school (MAN) 1 Sinjai. Journal of Language and Literature, 18(1), 20-27.

Kasper, G. (2006). Speech acts in interaction: Towards discursive pragmatics. Pragmatics and language learning, 11.

Kreidler, Charles.W. (1998). Introduction to English Semantics. London: Routledge.

Kurdghelashvili, T. (2015). Speech acts and politeness strategies in an EFL classroom in Georgia. International Journal of Cognitive and Language Sciences, 9(1), 306-309.

Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Searle, John R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, John R. (1979). Expressing and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Septianingsih, T., & Warsono, W. (2017). The types and power relation of directive speech acts in classroom interaction. English Education Journal, 7(1), 26-33.

Susanti, R., Sumarlam, S., Djatmika, D., & Rohmadi, M. (2020). Students-Lecturer (s’) Speech Acts in the Academic Practical Teaching Situated-Communication. RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 13(1), 84-96.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zeff, B. B. (2016). The Pragmatics of Greetings: Teaching Speech Acts in the EFL Classroom. In English Teaching Forum (Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 2-11). US Department of State. Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Office of English Language Programs, SA-5, 2200 C Street NW 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20037.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-13

Issue

Section

Articles