THE COMPARISON OF LANGUAGE SKILLS BETWEEN MALE AND FEMALE STUDENTS USING THE BOOK "FROG, WHERE ARE YOU?" BY MERCER MAYER

Authors

  • Tyas Desita Wengrum Universitas Mitra Indonesia
  • Adhi Nurhartanto Universitas Mitra Indonesia
  • Meutia Rachmatia Universitas Muhammadiyah Kotabumi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v5i2.29737

Keywords:

grammatical, language proficiency, language ability, male and female learners

Abstract

This research focuses on students' language learning in 5th grade primary school. The research project examines on the language learning of 5th grade primary school learners.  The focus is to compare the linguistic skill of male and female learners by taking retelling stories using Indonesian language.  The factor used in this research is grammatical cohesion analysis which examines all grammatical aspects which includes sentence, clause, grammatical errors, emotive word, and interference. Data was gained through a controlled observation and analysed using the contrasting descriptive method which looks how male and female learners construct sentences and clauses, as well as the grammar mistakes they make.  5th grade male learners of Integrated Islamic Elementary School Al Abidin Surakarta were discovered to be more proficient in using Indonesian than female students were. Female students tend to make fewer grammatical errors than male learners when reciting Indonesian stories.  Male learners, on the other hand, are more imaginative and use emotive language frequently, indicating that male learners are more expressive while telling stories.  According to the data, male learners were more proficient in using Indonesian than female learners.  When narrating stories, female learners make fewer errors in grammar.  It also shows a lack of emotional connection.  It may be fair to say that male learners’ proficiency in telling stories is better than the female learners’ due to their expressiveness in telling the language but female learners are more structured in producing their language

References

Aziz, R. (2006). Studi tentang Kreatifitas pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama di Kota Malang. Psikoislamika, 3(2), 239–254.

Aziz, R., & Mangestuti, R. (2005). Tiga Jenis Kecerdasan dan Agresivitas Mahasiswa. Psikologika, 21(11), 64–77.

Brown, D. H. (2007). Prinsip Pembelajaran Bahasa. Pearson Education.

Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspect of The Theory of Syntax. The MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (2009). First Language Acquisition (second edi). Cambridge University Press.

Clark, E. (2009). First Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.

Dardjowidjojo, S. (2012). Psikolinguistik: Pengantar Pemahaman Bahasa Manusia. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course. Routledge.

Krasen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. University of Southern California.

Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, Where Are You. Dial Books for Young Reader.

Rahmawati, D., Triyani, N., Nurmaula, S., & Mekar, I. (2018). Analisis Perbandingan Pemerolehan Bahasa Anak Perempuan dan Laki-Laki Usia 2 Tahun pada Aspek Fonologi. Parole: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(2), 233–240.

Ratminingsih, N. (2013). Pengaruh Gender dan Tipe Kepribadian Terhadap Kompetensi Berbicara Bahasa Inggris. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 3, 278–288.

Sembiring, S., Djatmika, D., & Santosa, R. (2016). Perbandingan Pemerolehan Bahasa Inggris sebagai Bahasa Inggris antara Pembelajar Perempuan dan Pembelajar Laki-Laki Mahasiswa Program Studi Sastra Inggris. Prasasti: Journal of Linguistics, 151–167.

Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (Fifth Edit). Blackwell Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-07

How to Cite

Wengrum, T. D., Nurhartanto, A., & Rachmatia, M. (2023). THE COMPARISON OF LANGUAGE SKILLS BETWEEN MALE AND FEMALE STUDENTS USING THE BOOK "FROG, WHERE ARE YOU?" BY MERCER MAYER. Lexeme : Journal of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 186–191. https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v5i2.29737

Issue

Section

Articles