A Grammatical Errors Analysis in Students’ Comparison and Contrast Paragraph Writing

Authors

  • Ridha Ikhva Erviana Universitas Pamulang
  • Veny Kurniasih Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v6i2.42406

Keywords:

comparison and contrast paragraphs, grammatical errors, writing

Abstract

This research focuses on analyzing grammatical errors in comparison and contrast paragraphs written by second-semester students of the English Department at Universitas Pamulang. Grammatical errors often occur in students' writing when the grammatical arrangement does not follow grammar rules. The main purposes of the research were to identify the types of grammatical errors and to describe the most frequent types of grammatical errors found in students' writing of comparison and contrast paragraphs. This research was carried out from October 2023 to June 2024 and used a qualitative descriptive research design. The subjects of the research were the twenty comparison and contrast paragraphs written by the students as a writing assignment. The data were collected from the original students' writing products, and the data were observed to find grammatical errors and classify the types of errors. Furthermore, the most frequent type of grammatical error was also calculated. The researcher analyzed the types of grammatical errors in students' writing based on Dulay, Burt, and Krashen's theory. The results showed that there were 127 grammatical errors, which were classified into 47 omission errors, 35 addition errors, 30 misformation errors, and 15 misordering errors. Additionally, the most frequent type of grammatical error was omission errors, which accounted for 37% of the total errors and had the highest percentage. The results of this research have implications for understanding strategies to address students' grammatical problems when they are producing text.

References

Bitterlin, G., Price, D., & Savage, K. L. (2010). Grammar Matters: Teaching Grammar in Adult ESL Programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Buman, Allan G. (2004). Elementary Statistics: A Step by Step Approach, 5th edition. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Cohen. (1994). Assessing Language Ability in the Classroom. Boston: Heinle Publisher.

Deuchar, M., Leech G., and Hoogenraad, R. (2003). English Grammar for Today: A New Introduction. London: The Macmillan Press.

Dulay, H., Burt, M., and Krashen, S. (1982). Language Two. New York: University Press.

Ellis, R. (2008). Second Language Acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press

Fitrawati & Safitri, D. (2021). Students' Grammatical errors in Essay Writing: A Pedagogical Grammar Reflection. Internation Journal of Language Education, 5(2), 74-88. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i2.15241

Gerot, L. and Wignell, P. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Sydney: Antipodean Educational Enterprises (AEE).

Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching 3rd. London: Longan.

Nainggolan, E. S. (2021). Error Analysis on Simple Present Tense of Students’ Sentences. The 10th National Online Seminar on Linguistics, Language Teaching and Literature, 10(1), 70–84. Retrieved on 04 January 2024, from https://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/NOSLLTL/article/viewFile/9317/5892

Nunan. 2005. Practical English Language Teaching. New York: The Mc Graw Hill Companies.

Richard, J. C. and Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. London: Cambridge University.

Thornbury, S. 1999. How to Teach Grammar. England: Longman Pearson Education Limited.

Wildan. H. S. (2021). An Analysis of Grammatical errors in Writing Procedure Text Made by Ninth Grade Students of MTs Unggulan Nuris Jember. Digital Library UIN KHAS Jember, 01(02). 64-76. Retrieved on 15 January 2024, from http://digilib.uinkhas.ac.id/12012/

Downloads

Published

2024-08-05

Issue

Section

Articles