The Language of Engagement: Speech Functions and Mood in the Berkeley Exec Ed Podcast

Authors

  • Jelly Prima Krisnawati Silaban Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Sekar Azzahra Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Nurlela Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v7i2.47300

Keywords:

Barkeley Exec Ed podcast, interpersonal function, moods, speech function

Abstract

This paper investigates the interpersonal functions in the discourse of the Berkeley Exec Ed podcast, specifically the episode "The Science of Happiness & the Greater Good," using the Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) framework. It explores how language functions in interaction, conveys information, and entertains the audience by applying speech functions and mood types. A qualitative approach is used to analyze clause separations in the podcast transcript, which are then categorized based on speech functions—such as statements, questions, commands, and offers—and their corresponding moods: declarative, interrogative, and imperative. Most of the interactions (58.1%) are realized through statements using declarative moods. This trend indicates that the hosts aim to present information in a manner that is authoritative and informative, thereby building credibility and trust. Other functions include questioning (11.6%) and inviting (16.3%), which utilize interrogative and imperative moods, respectively, to encourage audience participation and engagement. This strategic interplay of linguistic elements demonstrates how speech functions and mood types contribute to the dynamism, interactivity, and effectiveness of the podcast discourse. The study highlights the crucial role of interpersonal language functions in fostering meaningful connections and maintaining audience interest in podcast formats. It also offers insights that can inform broader practices in media communication and content creation

References

Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2005). Transformational leadership: Second edition. Transformational Leadership: Second Edition, 1–282. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617095

Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. Guilford Press.

Darong, H. C. (2021). Interpersonal Function of Joe Biden’s Victory Speech (Systemic Functional Linguistics View). Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 5(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i1.31420

Fauziyah, H. R., & Nurjannah, N. (2019). An Analysis of Interpersonal Meanings in Students’ Instagram Caption. Academic Journal Perspective : Education, Language, and Literature, 7(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.33603/perspective.v7i2.2784

Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 11, Issue 1). http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI

Halliday, M. A. K., Sr., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Functional Coatings, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394207305.ch1

Herman, Saputra, N., Ngongo, M., & Fatmawati, E. (2022). Delivering A Good Speech by Identifying the Interpersonal Meaning Found in Joe Biden’s Victory Speech: A Case on Systemic Functional Linguistics. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 22(3), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v22i3.77

Hulu, F. (2019). Interpersonal Function in Martin Luther King Jr’s Speech. International Journal of Systemic Functional Linguistics, 2(1), 43–46. https://doi.org/10.55637/ijsfl.2.1.999.43-46

Huo, H., & Zhang, Y. (2023). An Analysis of the Interpersonal Function of Joe Biden’s Inaugural Speech. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 9(3), 204–207. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlll.2023.9.3.405

Mulya, R. ., & Sartika, D. . (2023). the Interpersonal Function of President Joko Widodo’S Speech At the Cop26 Summit in Glasgow. Linguistik Terapan, 19(3), 218. https://doi.org/10.24114/lt.v19i3.42054

Nafalia, Vina; Hartati, E. (2022). An Analysis of Mood and Speech Function in The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon Talk Show. KLAUSA (Kajian Linguistik, Pembelajaran Bahasa, Dan Sastra), 6(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.33479/klausa.v6i2.625

Shekhani, H. A., & Taha, J. A. (2023). Halliday’s Interpersonal Meta-function Analysis of Entrepreneur’s Public Speech in English and Central Kurdish. Koya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.14500/kujhss.v6n1y2023.pp22-31

Simanjuntak, N., Simaremare, R. M., Saputra, N., Ngongo, M., & Herman, H. (2022). ‘We All Are Perfectly Imperfect’: an Interpersonal Metafunction of Muniba Mazari’S Speech in a Case on Systemic Functional Linguistics. English Review: Journal of English Education, 10(3), 793–800. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v10i3.6326

Vinchristo, A. A. (2022). Interpersonal Meta function Analysis of Editorial Discourse in Business-Related Issues Using English Systemic Linguistics. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.911518

Yanto, E. S., & Pravitasari, H. (2023). the Realization of Interpersonal Meaning of Spoken Texts in an Efl International Textbook: a Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective. Wiralodra English Journal, 7(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.31943/wej.v7i1.190

Zhang, Q., & Ge, D. (2023). Analysis of New Year Address from the Perspective of Interpersonal Function. Scholars International Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 6(03), 178–181. https://doi.org/10.36348/sijll.2023.v06i03.002

Zhou, S. (2024). An Analysis of Obama’s Inaugural Address from the Perspective of Halliday’s Interpersonal Function. Studies in Linguistics and Literature, 8(3), p99. https://doi.org/10.22158/sll.v8n3p99

Downloads

Published

2025-05-25

How to Cite

Silaban, J. P. K., Azzahra, S., & Nurlela. (2025). The Language of Engagement: Speech Functions and Mood in the Berkeley Exec Ed Podcast. Lexeme : Journal of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v7i2.47300

Issue

Section

Articles