Code-Mixing Patterns and Viewer Perspectives in Livy Renata’s YouTube Video: A Sociolinguistic Analysis

Authors

  • Lusiana Khoirun Nisa Universitas Jember
  • Dewianti Khazanah Universitas Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v7i2.50649

Keywords:

code mixing, language attitudes, perspectives, social identity, viewers comments, YouTube

Abstract

This study discusses the use of code-mixing between English and Indonesian in Livy Renata's YouTube video entitled “meeting Reemar for the first time!”. Using a sociolinguistic approach, this study analyzes the types of code-mixing and viewers' perspectives on its use. This phenomenon is relevant because it reflects bilingualism in Indonesian society as well as the influence of social media in shaping linguistic perceptions in the digital era. The data used are collected from code-mixing utterances by the speakers using a content analysis method. The researchers adjust the video transcription that is displayed in English with all the speakers’ utterances, which partly use Bahasa Indonesia. The results show that insertional code-mixing is the most frequently used type, accounting for 40% of the total. Alternation comes next at 33.3%, while the remaining 26.7% includes congruent lexicalization. As stated by Geroda & Yeusy (2022), the use of insertional code-mixing means that the speakers want to show their social identity. In addition, it is also used to attract the attention of the viewers who are mostly Indonesians. With this, the use of code-mixing in the video receives positive and negative responses, which can be seen in the comments section. These viewers' responses are differentiated based on language attitudes theory, whether they are positive cognitive, positive affective, negative cognitive, or negative affective. Based on the viewers' comments, the use of code-mixing by the speakers is mostly perceived positively.

References

Abdullah, A., & Usman, R. (2021). Students’ perception towards code-switching and code-mixing in sociolinguistics: a case at an English education major. EDULINK (Education and Linguistic Knowledge) Journal, 3(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.32503/edulink.v3i1.1476

Astri, Z., & Fian, A. (2020). The sociolinguistics study on the use of code mixing in Gita Savitri Devi’s YouTube channel video. Scope of English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 3(2), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.46918/seltics.v0i0.728

Colorafi, K. J., & Evans, B. (2016). Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research. HHS Public Access, 9(4), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586715614171.Qualitative

Eberhard, D. M., Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (2025). Languages of the world. Ethnologue. http://www.ethnologue.com

Garrett, P. (2010). Attitudes to language. Cambridge University Press.

Geroda, G. B., & Yeusy, R. (2022). Code mixing used by Cinta Laura in Mata Najwa. Sistema Jurnal Pendidikan, 3(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.24903/sjp.v3i2.1280

Gillham, B. (2008). Developing a questionnaire. A&C Black.

Herman, H., Thao, N. Van, Purba, R., & Simanjuntak, N. S. U. (2022). Attracting viewers through advertisement by using code mixing: A sociolinguistics study. Anglophile Journal, 2(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.51278/anglophile.v2i2.304

Lianda, N. P., Lismalinda, & Rizka, B. (2022). The analysis of code mixing in social media: a case study of code-mixing used. Journal of English Teaching and Linguistics, 3(2), 116. https://doi.org/10.55616/jetli.v3i2.398

Muysken, P. (2000). Bilingual speech: A typology of code-mixing. Cambridge University Press.

Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research : Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747

Pratami, A. A. N., & Astuti, B. (2024). Membangun kredibilitas influencer instagram : Efek sikap dan respon p9erilaku followers terhadap influencer. Journal of Economics and Business, 8(2), 1816–1831. https://doi.org/10.33087/ekonomis.v8i2.1671

Stemler, S. E. (2015). Content Analysis. In R. Scott & S. Kosslyn (Eds.), Emerging trends in social and behavioral sciences. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0053

Suwito. (1988). Pengantar awal sosiolinguistik teori dan problema. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Talkpod. (2021). Rachel dan Livy waifu para pecinta game. https://youtu.be/X2Kv_0ePUig?si=eWfFWugtt6q4Z3aB

Tandaju, C., & Koli, N. (2024). Tindak tutur “ Bahasa Jaksel ” sebagai komunikasi kontekstual di kalangan generasi milenial Jakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Ilmiah Komunikasi, 204, 251–264. https://doi.org/10.32509/wacana.v23i2.3908

Tarihoran, N., Fachriyah, E., & Sumirat, I. R. (2022). The impact of social media on the use of code mixing by generation z. Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(7), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i07.27659

Downloads

Published

2025-07-25

How to Cite

Nisa, L. K., & Khazanah, D. (2025). Code-Mixing Patterns and Viewer Perspectives in Livy Renata’s YouTube Video: A Sociolinguistic Analysis. Lexeme : Journal of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v7i2.50649

Issue

Section

Articles