Social Actor Representation in Prabowo Subianto’s 2024 Debate Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v7i2.51304Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis, Political Discourse, Presidential Debate, Social Actor RepresentationAbstract
This study examines how social actors are represented in Prabowo Subianto’s discourse during the first 2024 Indonesian presidential debate. Drawing on Theo van Leeuwen’s (2008) Social Actor Theory within the framework of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), the study analyzes seventeen selected utterances to uncover the ideological and discursive strategies employed to construct political identity and reinforce legitimacy. Using a qualitative descriptive design, the data were obtained from the official debate transcript and analyzed through categorization of inclusion, exclusion, activation, personalization, and other representation strategies. The findings reveal that Prabowo frequently activates himself as a patriotic reformer, elevates the people as sovereign decision-makers, background institutions, and subtly delegitimizes political opponents through irony, contrast, and historical recontextualization. The study also shows how humor, metaphor, and informal language are strategically used to foster emotional proximity with the public. These strategies contribute to building a persuasive and ideologically charged public persona. The results demonstrate that live political performance in presidential debates functions as a site of symbolic authority construction and ideological negotiation. This research offers both theoretical and empirical contributions to discourse studies and political communication, particularly in the context of contemporary Indonesian democracy.
References
Budhiono, R. H. (2020). Keraton Agung Sejagat dan representasi para aktor sosialnya dalam wacana berita di Kompas.com. Suar Betang, 15(1), 1–13. https://suarbetang.kemdikbud.go.id/jurnal/index.php/BETANG/article/view/165/130
Budiarsih, S., & Asropah. (2024). Pidato pelantikan presiden terpilih Prabowo Subianto tahun 2024. Parafrasa: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajaran, 6(2), 7–16. https://journals.unikal.ac.id/index.php/parafrasa/article/view/200
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Evayani, W., & Rido, A. (2019). Representation of social actors in sexual violence issue in The New York Times and The Jakarta Post newspapers: A critical discourse analysis. Teknosastik, 17(2), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.33365/ts.v17i2.322
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Firiani, K. N., & Sabilah, D. (2019). Analisis teks berita pendekatan Theo van Leeuwen social actors approach (SAA) teori inklusi dalam berita “Kamaruddin blak-blakan soal Susi Art Ferdy Sambo yang disebut bikin gaduh persidangan.” Lintang Aksara, 55(4), 524–530. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0514749219040037
Firiani, L., & Sabilah, F. (2021). Political discourse strategies in Indonesian online media. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 3(4), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v3i4.711
Gee, J. P., & Handford, M. (2012). The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809068-15
Humaira, Agung, M., Ghafary, M., & Nugraha, T. C. (2023). Berita ledakan bom Istanbul dari laman BBC Arabic: CDA pendekatan Theo van Leeuwen. Journal of Linguistic Phenomena, 1(2), 77. https://doi.org/10.24198/jlp.v1i2.43714
Humaira, H., Rahman, F., & Darwis, M. (2020). The representation of politicians in Indonesian online news: A critical discourse analysis. Humaniora, 32(3), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.58634
Jendeya, H. (2022). A corpus–based critical discourse analysis of exclusion strategies in political newspaper articles: The March of Return in Gaza. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 5(4), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2022.5.4.19
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. SAGE Publications.
Putri, R. C. S., & Mardiah, Z. (2024). Corpus-assisted CDA of George Floyd’s murder reports on CNN and Aljazeera. Jurnal Arbitrer, 11(1), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.11.1.96-108.2024
Ratnaningsih, D. (2019). Analisis wacana kritis: Sebuah teori dan implementasi. Universitas Muhammadiyah Kotabumi.
Sarani, A., & Kord, S. (2021). A study of the representation of social actors in Touchstone series: A critical discourse analysis perspective. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.2018.60132
van Dijk, T. A. (1984). Prejudice in discourse: An analysis of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 11(4), 375–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(87)90096-8
van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 32–70). Routledge.
van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford University Press.
van Leeuwen, T. (2013). Critical discourse analysis and multimodality. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–6). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0267
Young, L., & Harrison, C. (2004). Systemic functional linguistics and critical discourse analysis. Continuum.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jelly Prima Krisnawati Silaban, Dzikri Ilma, Pemina Br. Sembiring, T. Silvana Sinar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
