Formulaic or Felt? Investigating the Use of “How’s your day?” in an International Primary Classroom

Authors

  • Sitti Maryam Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v8i1.54476

Keywords:

conversational routines, expressive communication, international school, pragmatics, language acquisition

Abstract

This study investigates the pragmatic and cultural function of the phrase “How’s your day?” in an international primary school classroom in Makassar, Indonesia. Drawing from reflective observation and daily interaction with Grade 4 to 6 students, the research explores how this simple conversational question facilitates students’ confidence, expressiveness, and natural use of English. The study adopts a reflective descriptive design, built on long-term classroom experiences, observation and interaction with students -where English served as the primary language of communication. The data were generated through memory-based reconstruction, reflective journals, and non-recorded classroom observations. The analysis followed a thematic reflection approach.  Findings reveal that “How’s your day?” operates as more than a casual greeting. It acts as a social bridge fostering authentic communication, empathy, and a sense of belonging among young learners. Students initially responded formulaically but gradually developed ownership of the phrase, using it spontaneously with peers, teachers, and even family members. The exchange nurtured natural speech habits and pragmatic awareness, showing that emotional engagement and context-rich interactions enhance language learning more effectively than rigid grammar-based instruction. Pedagogically, the study highlights the importance of integrating authentic conversational routines into English language teaching, especially in multilingual environments. Such interactions humanize communication, promote cultural understanding, and support affective dimensions of language learning. The study concludes that teaching English expressiveness is not only about fluency but also about connection, confidence, and care values embedded in meaningful conversation

References

Alston, W. P., & Searle, J. R. (1970). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. The Philosophical Quarterly, 20(79), 172. https://doi.org/10.2307/2218090

Bergman, R. (2004). Caring for the ethical ideal: Nel Noddings on moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 33(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724042000215203

Caulfield, J. (2019). How to Do Thematic Analysis: 6 Steps & Examples. Scribbr, 1–5. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/thematic-analysis/

Duff, P. A. (2011). Second Language Socialization. The Handbook of Language Socialization, 564–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444342901.ch24

Gilbert, R. K. (2018). Review of The translanguaging classroom: Leveraging student bilingualism for learning. Education Review, 25(1), 61–63. https://doi.org/10.14507/er.v25.2341

Kissine, M. (2012). Sentences, utterances, and speech acts. The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139022453.010

Kramsch, C. (2002). In search of the intercultural. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6(2), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00188

Marn, T. M. (2016). Reconceptualizing qualitative research: methodologies without methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(6), 860–862. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1145281

Mateus, S. G. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism, and Education. Bilingual Research Journal, 37(3), 366–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2014.965361

McCarthy, M. (1992). Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 8(1), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/026565909200800108

Meyerhoff, M. (2018). Introducing sociolinguistics. Introducing Sociolinguistics, 1–376. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429507922

Norton, B. (2016). Identity and Language Learning: Back to the Future. TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 475–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.293

Norton, B., & De Costa, P. I. (2018). Research tasks on identity in language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 51(1), 90–112. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000325

Nottingham, J., Nottingham, J., & Renton, M. (2020). Why Dialogue? Challenging Learning Through Dialogue: Strategies to Engage Your Students and Develop Their Language of Learning, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506376547.n8

Oshima, D. Y. (2016). Pragmatics (Lecture on Language Education and Linguistic Information I) Speech Act. Anyflip, 1–24. https://anyflip.com/pbau/waxa/basic

Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (2014). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. Language and Communication, 191–226. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315836027-12

Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching Pragmatics: Trends and Issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (pp. 289–310).

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. University of Texas Press Slavic Series, 1, 91. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9780511840975/type/book

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Taylor and Francis Ltd 5, 9780203827(4), 1–246. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203827826

Wray, A. (2012). What do we (think we) know about formulaic language? an evaluation of the current state of play. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719051200013X

Downloads

Published

2025-12-28

How to Cite

Maryam, S. (2025). Formulaic or Felt? Investigating the Use of “How’s your day?” in an International Primary Classroom. Lexeme : Journal of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v8i1.54476