Types and Functions of Sarcasm in Indonesian Political Conversation on ‘X’

Authors

  • Saskia Aliyah Putri Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Syaufah Sabila Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Mariska Adinda br. Ginting Suka Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Fitri Hasibuan Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v8i1.54793

Keywords:

Political Discourse, Pragmatics, Rhetorical Function, Sarcasm, X (Twitter)

Abstract

This study investigates how sarcasm is produced and functions within Indonesian political conversations on X (formerly Twitter). Although previous research has examined sarcasm in entertainment, religion, and media contexts, studies focusing on political discourse especially within Indonesia’s highly polarized digital environment remain limited. This gap indicates the need to understand not only the types of sarcasm used but also their rhetorical purposes in online political interactions. Therefore, the aim of this study is to classify the forms of sarcasm using Camp’s (2011) framework and to reveal how each type functions as a tool for political criticism, identity building, and ideological positioning. Adopting a qualitative descriptive design, this research analyzes 30 sarcastic posts and replies responding to government-related issues on X. The instrument consists of an analytical rubric based on linguistic cues of sarcasm, while the data were collected through purposive sampling of public posts from September to October 2025. The data were processed through transcription, classification, and interpretive analysis. The findings show that propositional and illocutionary sarcasm dominate, indicating a strong preference for indirect yet sharp political critique. Sarcasm also serves as a rhetorical strategy for expressing resistance, mocking authority, and strengthening group affiliation among users. These findings imply that sarcasm is not merely humor in digital communication but a significant form of civic engagement and political meaning-making in Indonesia’s online public sphere.

References

Anjayuni, E., Malayati, R. M., & Rahmah, S. N. (2024). Sarcasm humor in Habib Ja’far’s Log-In content on Deddy Corbuzier’s YouTube channel. KOMUNIKE: Jurnal Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam, 16(2), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.20414/jurkom.v16i2.11023

Attardo, S. (2000). Irony markers and functions: Towards a goal-oriented theory of irony and its processing. RASK: International Journal of Language and Communication, 12(1), 3–20.

Azis, A., & Marlina, L. (2020). Analysis of sarcasm found in Keith Alberstadt’s comedy. English Language and Literature, 9(2), 215. https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v9i2.7805

Camp, E. (2011). Sarcasm, pretense, and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Noûs, 46(4), 587–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00822.x

Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford University Press.

Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.121

Dresner, E., & Herring, S. C. (2010). Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory, 20(3), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01362.x

Dynel, M. (2014). Isn’t it ironic? Defining the scope of humorous irony. Humor, 27(4), 619–639. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2014-0091

Filik, R., Țurcan, A., Thompson, D., Harvey, N., Davies, H., & Turner, A. (2016). Sarcasm and emoticons: Comprehension and emotional impact. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(11), 2137–2156. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1106566

Gibbs, R. W. (2000). Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1–2), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2000.9678862

Kreuz, R. J., & Glucksberg, S. (1989). How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(4), 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.4.374

Kreuz, R. J., & Roberts, R. M. (1995). Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor and Symbol, 10(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1001_3

Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: Social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188

Lubis, F. K., & Bahri, S. (2023). Sarcasm in Indonesian television show Pesbukers. Randwick International of Social Science Journal, 4(1), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.47175/rissj.v4i1.626

Merrison, A. J., Wilson, J. J., Davies, B. L., & Haugh, M. (2012). Getting stuff done: Comparing e-mail requests from students in higher education in Britain and Australia. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(9), 1077–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.002

Nugrahani, F., Widayati, M., Darmini, W., Sudiyatmi, T., & Imron AM, A. (2019). Sarcasm in Indonesian political culture. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Language, Literature and Society for Education. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-12-2018.2282775

Pasa, T. A., Nuriadi, & Lail, H. (2021). An analysis of sarcasm on hate speech utterances on Just Jared Instagram account. Journal of English Education Forum (JEEF), 1(1), 10–19. https://jeef.unram.ac.id/index.php/jeef/article/view/94

Puri, A. D., & Baskara, G. (2023). Irony and sarcasm in Nigel Ng’s stand-up comedy: Analyzing their role in creating humor. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Linguistik dan Sastra (SEMNALISA) III (pp. 218–226). https://e-journal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/semnalisa/article/view/7096

Saputra, A. F. (2024). The role of social media in building political discourse: Political polarization, UU ITE and echo chambers. IJTIHAD, 40(1), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.15548/ijt.v40i1.548

Saz-Rubio, M. (2023). Sarcasm, impoliteness, and political communication on Twitter: A comparative study of British and Spanish responses. Discourse, Context & Media, 53, 100669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2023.100669

Setiawati, T., Tiara, A., & Mustika, S. (2023). Social media as a negative source of political news in a polarized society? Indonesian and Filipino students’ perception. Jurnal Komunikasi, 17(2), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol17.iss2.art7

Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9429.003.0001

Simarmata, N. B., & Kusumoriny, L. A. (2024). Translation of sarcasm found in Tilik short movie. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.30605/25409190.779

Sitanggang, E. M., & Ningsih, T. (2022). Sarcasm used by netizens on Twitter: Case of election Bidden–Trump era. ISLLAC: Journal of Intensive Studies on Language, Literature, Art, and Culture. https://doi.org/10.17977/um006v6i12022p68-78

Tarwiyati, P., Putri, P., Prayitno, H., Huda, M., & Rahmawati, L. (2022). Sarcasm of news headlines on national electronic mass media and its relevance to learning Indonesian. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220503.029

Zappavigna, M. (2011). Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society, 13(5), 788–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385097

Downloads

Published

2026-01-08

How to Cite

Putri, S. A., Sabila, S., Suka, M. A. br. G., & Hasibuan, F. (2026). Types and Functions of Sarcasm in Indonesian Political Conversation on ‘X’. Lexeme : Journal of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v8i1.54793