Impoliteness Strategies Reflected in Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes (2024) Movie
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v8i1.55588Keywords:
culpeper, film discourse, impoliteness, kingdom of the planet of the apes, pragmaticAbstract
Language is a mirror of social life and power relations. In film discourse, verbal interaction not only delivers narrative meaning but also exposes ideological and emotional conflicts among characters. This study investigates the impoliteness strategies reflected in Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes (2024), using Culpeper’s (1996) theory as its main analytical framework. The research applies a qualitative descriptive approach to identify and interpret the forms and functions of impoliteness strategies used by the main characters, particularly Proximus Caesar, Noa, and Mae. The data are taken from the movie script and analyzed contextually to reveal the pragmatic functions of language. The findings indicate that all five types of impoliteness strategies proposed by Culpeper appear in the movie: bald on-record impoliteness, positive impoliteness, negative impoliteness, sarcasm or mock politeness, and withholding politeness. Each strategy performs different communicative roles such as asserting dominance, challenging authority, expressing resistance, and conveying emotional conflict. The study concludes that impoliteness in this film serves not only as an instrument of verbal aggression but also as a symbolic tool for establishing ideological power, resistance, and social identity in a post-apocalyptic society. Furthermore, the findings imply that analyzing impoliteness in fictional narratives offers critical insights into the dynamics of power and resistance, bridging the gap between cinematic discourse and real-world sociopolitical interactions.
References
Ardhy, M., Yuliasri, I., & Rozi, F. (2024). Impoliteness strategies implied among characters of The Simpsons Movie. Rainbow : Journal of Literature, Linguistics and Culture Studies, 13(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.15294/rainbow.v13i1.3809
Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in interaction. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Chatzakou, D., Leontiadis, I., Blackburn, J., Cristofaro, E. De, Stringhini, G., Vakali, A., & Kourtellis, N. (2019). Detecting Cyberbullying and Cyberaggression in Social Media. ACM Transactions on the Web, 13(3), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1145/3343484
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218
Culpeper, J. (2016). Impoliteness Strategies (pp. 421–445). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_16
Dynel, M. (2013). Humorous phenomena in dramatic discourse. European Journal of Humour Research, 1(1), 22–60. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2013.1.1.dynel
Garcia-Pastor, M. D. (2008). Political campaign debates: Zero-sum game or “I’ll scratch your back”? University of Valencia.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Edward Arnold.
Haugh, M. (2010). Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation, and face. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2106–2119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018
Leech, G. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press.
Lowe, C. (2009). Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(9), 1865–1869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.001
Novera, T., & Amalia, Y. S. (2025). An Analysis of Impoliteness Strategies Used by Wednesday Addams in Netflix’s Wednesday Season 1. JETLEE : Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 5(2), 282–307. https://doi.org/10.47766/jetlee.v5i2.6462
Nurjanah, S. F., Maisa, H. B., Zachrie, F., & Nurfauzan, A. (2024). An Analysis of Impoliteness Strategies in Turning Red Based on Culpeper’s Theory of Pragmatics. University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 8(1), 275–282.
Sibarani, M. D. T. (2025). Impoliteness strategies in the movie The chronicles of Narnia: The lion, the witch, and the wardrobe. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Tracy, K., & Tracy, S. J. (1998). Rudeness at 911 Reconceptualizing Face and Face Attack. Human Communication Research, 25(2), 225–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00444.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aris Agustian, Lazuardi Alvar Fikri, Firgi Ferdian, Sharla Marlizah, Darmawati Zega, Tiara Oktapiani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




