Exploring Students’ Perceptions of Intensive Reading Activities in an EFL Classroom: A Qualitative Study

Authors

  • Mahraini Agustina Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya
  • Rahmadila Eka Putri Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya
  • Hanifah Alifia Putri Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya
  • M. Farid Fazullah Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v8i2.58211

Keywords:

Intensive Reading, EFL Reading, Students’ Perceptions, Thematic Analysis, Qualitative Study

Abstract

Understanding students’ perceptions of intensive reading activities is important for improving reading instruction in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom. While previous studies have primarily focused on the effectiveness of intensive reading in improving reading outcomes, limited research has explored how students perceive and experience intensive reading activities in university-level EFL contexts. This study aimed to explore students’ perceptions of intensive reading activities in an EFL classroom. Employing a qualitative design, data were collected through an open-ended questionnaire administered via Google Forms to 43 undergraduate students enrolled in an Intensive Reading course at Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya. The responses were analyzed using thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke’s framework. The findings revealed three major themes: (1) intensive reading as a tool for comprehension and reading development, (2) vocabulary limitations and challenges in processing academic texts, and (3) self-regulated strategies for managing reading difficulties. Students generally perceived intensive reading positively because it helped them improve comprehension, develop reading strategies, and engage more actively with academic texts. However, they also reported challenges related to unfamiliar vocabulary, complex sentence structures, and lengthy texts. To address these difficulties, students employed various strategies, including rereading, contextual guessing, dictionary use, and skimming techniques. The study highlights the importance of instructional scaffolding, vocabulary support, and strategy instruction in helping students engage more effectively with intensive reading activities in EFL classrooms.

References

Ahmadi, M. R., Ismail, H. N., & Abdullah, M. K. K. (2013). The importance of metacognitive reading strategy awareness in reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n10p235

Alfansury, M. R., & Imaniar, F. (2025). Students’ perceptions of intensive reading to develop the students’ vocabulary acquisition on descriptive text. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(4), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.38250

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

Chachar, A. A., Pathan, H., Shah, S. W. A., & Mari, M. A. (2024). Exploring Pakistani EFL learners’ perceptions of intensive and extensive reading practices. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 20(1), 1–15. https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/518

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Day, R. R., & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge University Press.

Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2011). Teaching and researching reading (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.

Lindawati, R. (2021). Students’ perceptions towards extensive reading in EFL contexts. International Journal of English and Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.47709/ijeal.v1i2.1044

Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.

Nation, I. S. P. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing. Routledge.

Nuttall, C. (2005). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language (3rd ed.). Macmillan Education.

Oxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1

Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.). Longman.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909

Downloads

Published

2026-06-19

How to Cite

Agustina, M., Putri, R. E., Putri, H. A., & Fazullah, M. F. (2026). Exploring Students’ Perceptions of Intensive Reading Activities in an EFL Classroom: A Qualitative Study. Lexeme : Journal of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v8i2.58211

Issue

Section

Articles