Negotiating Power through Bilingual Signs: English and Filipino in the Linguistic Landscape of Divisoria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v8i2.62908Keywords:
Bilingual signage, Divisoria, Linguistic landscape, Multilingualism, Power dynamicsAbstract
Public signs function as semiotic resources through which multilingual communities organize communication and negotiate linguistic authority. Although Philippine linguistic landscape research has documented language distribution and code preference, less attention has been paid to how bilingual signs allocate communicative and symbolic functions across languages. This study examined power relations in 42 bilingual signs photographed along Ylaya Street, Divisoria, Manila. It identified the language combinations represented, determined preferred codes, and classified multilingual information using Ben-Rafael et al.'s (2006) distinction between top-down and bottom-up signs, Scollon and Scollon's (2003) geosemiotics, and Reh's (2004) typology of multilingual writing. English Filipino signs comprised 98% of the corpus, and bottom-up signs accounted for 36 of the 42 items. Although English appeared in every sign, Filipino was visually preferred in 62% of cases. Fragmentary multilingual information represented 95% of the corpus. Qualitative analysis showed that English indexed promotion, commercial legitimacy, standardized business practices, and institutional authority, whereas Filipino supported product identification, interpersonal engagement, and public regulation. The findings indicate that bilingual signage in Divisoria does not reproduce a simple hierarchy in which one language consistently dominates. Instead, sign producers distribute languages strategically to balance local accessibility with commercial and institutional authority. The study extends Philippine linguistic landscape scholarship by showing how functional specialization, visual salience, and sign provenance jointly construct power in a multilingual marketplace.
References
Al-Athwary, A. A. H. (2017). English and Arabic inscriptions in the linguistic landscape of Yemen: A multilingual writing approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(4), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.4p.149
Astillero, S. F. (2017). Linguistic schoolscape: Studying the place of English and Philippine languages of Irosin Secondary School. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 4(4), 30–37.
Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Amara, M. H., & Trumper-Hecht, N. (2006). Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: The case of Israel. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668383
Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845307
Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2006). Linguistic landscape and minority languages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668386
De Los Reyes, R. A. (2014). Language of “order”: English in the linguistic landscape of two major train stations in the Philippines. Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 2, 24–51. https://doi.org/10.59960/2.a2
Eclipse, A. N., & Tenedero, P. P. P. (2018). The linguistic landscape of Manila Central Post Office: A macro-linguistic analysis. Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 6, 157–176. https://doi.org/10.59960/6.a6
Gorter, D. (2013). Linguistic landscapes in a multilingual world. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 190–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190513000020
Jazul, M. E. M. A., & Bernardo, A. S. (2017). A look into Manila Chinatown’s linguistic landscape: The role of language and language ideologies. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 48, 75–98.
Jiao, Y., & Singh, M. K. M. (2024). Linguistic landscape in George Town, Malaysia: Language visibility in a postcolonial and globalized context. Ampersand, 13, Article 100202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2024.100202
Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970161002
Mulyawan, I. W. (2019). Impact of tourism on vernacular outdoor signs in Ubud, Bali, Indonesia. ISVS e-journal, 6(1), 42–49.
Pedrajas, J. (2020, August 22). Ylaya Street, Divisoria’s ‘textile capital’ gets a new look. Manila Bulletin. https://mb.com.ph/2020/08/22/ylaya-street-divisorias-textile-capital-gets-a-new-look/
Pennycook, A. (2007). Global Englishes and transcultural flows. Routledge.
Reh, M. (2004). Multilingual writing: A reader-oriented typology—with examples from Lira Municipality (Uganda). International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2004(170), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2004.2004.170.1
Rong, X. (2018). The linguistic landscape of Beijing tourism spots: A field-based sociolinguistic approach. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 4(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.18178/IJLLL.2018.4.1.144
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422724
Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Christchelle G. Mondano

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




