A MENAKAR KOMPETENSI ORGANISASI INTERNASIONAL: ANALISIS EXPRESSED POWERS, IMPLIED POWERS DAN REALITAS DAS SOLLEN-DAS SEIN
MENAKAR KOMPETENSI ORGANISASI INTERNASIONAL: ANALISIS EXPRESSED POWERS, IMPLIED POWERS DAN REALITAS DAS SOLLEN-DAS SEIN
Keywords:
Authority Of International Organizations, Expressed Powers, Implied Powers, Kewenangan Organisasi InternasionalAbstract
ABSTRACT
This study discusses the dynamics of decision-making in international organizations through the analysis of the relationship between normative authority frameworks and their empirical practices. The research focuses on two main forms of competence, namely the powers explicitly stated in the organization's charter and the implied powers that arise from operational necessities to achieve institutional goals. The distinction between das sollen and das sein is used as an analytical framework to assess tensions between legal norms and organizational practices on the ground. Through case studies of WHO, IMF, and ASEAN, this study shows how international organizations often have to act beyond their textual mandates to respond to rapidly evolving global issues, while also highlighting potential conflicts regarding the limits of authority and institutional legitimacy. The research findings emphasize the importance of balancing organizational flexibility with compliance with the founding charter to ensure that actions remain effective and legal. This study contributes to both conceptual and practical understanding of the development of the authority of international organizations amid contemporary global dynamics.
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini membahas dinamika pembuatan keputusan dalam organisasi internasional melalui analisis hubungan antara kerangka kewenangan normatif dan praktik empirisnya. Penelitian ini berfokus pada dua bentuk kompetensi utama, yaitu kekuasaan yang dinyatakan secara eksplisit dalam piagam organisasi dan kekuasaan yang tersirat yang muncul dari kebutuhan operasional untuk mencapai tujuan institusional. Perbedaan antara das sollen dan das sein digunakan sebagai kerangka analisis untuk menilai ketegangan antara norma hukum dan praktik organisasi di lapangan. Melalui studi kasus WHO, IMF, dan ASEAN, penelitian ini menunjukkan bagaimana organisasi internasional seringkali harus bertindak di luar mandat tekstual mereka untuk merespons isu global yang berkembang pesat, sambil juga menyoroti potensi konflik mengenai batas-batas otoritas dan legitimasi institusional. Temuan penelitian menekankan pentingnya menyeimbangkan fleksibilitas organisasi dengan kepatuhan terhadap piagam pendiri untuk memastikan bahwa tindakan tetap efektif dan legal. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi pada pemahaman konseptual maupun praktis mengenai perkembangan wewenang organisasi internasional di tengah dinamika global kontemporer.
References
Abbott, K., & Snidal, D. (2020). Hard and soft law in international governance revisited. Journal of International Law, 45(2), 125–147.
Alvarez, J. E. (2022). The law of international organizations in the age of global governance. Oxford University Press.
Bovens, M. (2021). Understanding accountability in international institutions. Governance, 34(3), 567–584.
Brooks, S. (2023). Reassessing IMF authority in contemporary financial governance. International Monetary Review, 19(1), 44–63.
Cogan, J. (2021). International organizations and the limits of legal mandate. International Legal Studies, 27(4), 233–258.
Fassbender, B. (2021). The constitutional architecture of international organizations. European Journal of International Law, 32(3), 621–645.
Ferreira, F. (2022). WHO’s evolving authority in global health governance. Global Health Law Review, 14(2), 88–110.
Grant, R., & Keohane, R. (2020). Accountability and abuses of power in global governance. International Organization, 74(1), 123–142.
Grabel, I. (2021). IMF policy influence and developmental sovereignty. Journal of Global Economic Policy, 12(3), 201–220.
Hafner-Burton, E. (2023). International organizations in crisis response. Journal of Global Governance, 29(1), 45–67.
Hartono, A. (2024). Normative limits of WHO travel advisories during pandemics. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 21(1), 55–74.
Henriksen, A. (2020). International organizations and their legal constraints. Cambridge University Press.
Henriksen, A. (2021). Normative frameworks and institutional legitimacy. Global Policy Studies, 8(2), 99–120.
Klabbers, J. (2020). Virtues of international organizations. Nordic Journal of International Law, 89(2), 123–145.
Klabbers, J. (2022). The law of international organizations: A contemporary perspective. Oxford University Press.
Koskenniemi, M. (2022). International law and the changing structure of global governance. Leiden Journal of International Law, 35(3), 451–472.
Krasner, S. (2025). Normative and practical tensions in global institutions. Governance and Society, 17(1), 1–20.
Martins, R. (2024). IMF interventions and state economic sovereignty. Journal of International Economic Law, 27(2), 112–139.
McCarthy, J. (2021). The constitutional limits of treaty-based organizations. International Law Quarterly, 39(4), 325–347.
Novrianda, D. (2024). Kompetensi organisasi internasional dalam tatanan global baru. Jurnal Hukum Global, 16(1), 77–102.
Pauwelyn, J. (2021). Functionalism and legal authority in international organizations. Journal of Legal Theory, 58(1), 89–110.
Rahman, F. (2022). ASEAN’s normative structure and institutional development. Southeast Asian Affairs Review, 30(2), 144–168.
Reinisch, A. (2021). International organizations and their mandates. Austrian Review of International Law, 12(1), 33–56.
Reinisch, A. (2023). Adaptive authority in international institutional practice. Journal of International Institutional Law, 9(2), 210–234.
Sasmita, R. (2023). Implied powers dalam hukum organisasi internasional. Jurnal Hukum Internasional Indonesia, 19(2), 44–63.
Scharf, M. (2020). Sovereignty and international institutional authority. American Journal of International Law, 114(1), 68–92.
Schermers, H., & Blokker, N. (2020). International institutional law: Unity within diversity. Brill.
Shelton, D. (2022). Soft law and global governance mechanisms. International Environmental Law Review, 14(1), 15–38.
Simarmata, J. (2023). Legitimasi organisasi internasional di era multikrisis. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 53(3), 341–360.
Suryadinata, L. (2024). ASEAN’s cautious institutional expansion in security governance. Asia-Pacific Policy Journal, 12(1), 90–111.
Tallberg, J. (2021). Delegation and control in international organizations. Governance Studies, 15(4), 557–579.
Tsagourias, N. (2023). Legal interpretation and functional authority in IOs. International Organizations Law Review, 20(2), 155–178.
Venzke, I. (2020). International law and the politics of interpretation. European Journal of International Law, 31(4), 1127–1146.
Wijaya, R. (2022). Evaluasi kewenangan organisasi internasional dalam perspektif global. Jurnal Politik Internasional, 8(2), 122–141.
Zeng, L. (2021). WHO decision-making and state reactions during global health emergencies. Journal of Health Diplomacy, 9(1), 33–57.
Zhang, H. (2025). Institutional flexibility and legitimacy in international organizations. Global Legal Review, 4(1), 76–98.
PUBLICATION ETHICS
FOCUS AND SCOPE
EDITORIAL TEAM
REVIEW PROCESS
CONTACT US
