Digital Mapping of Resilience and Academic Skills in the Perspective of Society 5.0 for Higher Education
Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic has changed the policy of higher education in Indonesia from conventional learning to online. This policy change encourages students to have psychological resilience and adaptability through digital resilience and academic skills. The research method is divided into two stages: qualitatively formulating a measurement construct using an open-ended questionnaire with a total of 137 respondents. Based on the qualitative data, a digital measuring instrument for resilience and academic skills was developed as a 5-choice Likert Scale. The second stage is carried out quantitatively, looking at the reliability and item-total correlation test to select items not aligned with the measuring function using the Statistical Program for Social Science.. The results showed that 64.9% of respondents had high resilience, 33.8% had moderate stability, and 1.2% had low strength. While analyzing the items measuring digital resilience and academic skills research, it was found that Cronbach's Alpha reliability value was 0.917. So the measuring instrument for digital resilience and academic skills is reliable and appropriate to be used to explain the condition of students during Covid-19.
Keywords: covid- 19, digital, Society 5.0
References
Ozdemir V, Hekim N. Birth of Industry 5.0: Making Sense of Big Data with Artificial Intelligence, ‘the Internet of Things’ and Next-Generation Technology Policy. Omi. A J. Integr. Biol. 22(1), 65–76 (2018).
Weller M, Anderson T. Digital Resilience in Higher Education. Eur. J. Open, Distance E-Learning 16(1), 53–66 (2013).
Wright D. Toward digital resilience. Elementa 2016(2), 1–21 (2016).
Kohn V. How employees’ digital resilience makes organizations more secure. Proceedings of the 24th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: Information Systems (IS) for the Future. Presented at: PACIS 2020. 2020.
Sudibjo N, Idawati L, Harsanti H. Characteristics of Learning in the Era of Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0. Int. Conf. Educ. Technol. 372(ICoET), 276–279 (2019).
Weller M. Digital Resilience. Digit. Sch. 168–184 (2021).
Fukuyama M. Society 5.0: Aiming for a New Human-centered Society. Japan SPOTLIGHT 2(1), 8–13 (2018).
Schemmer M, Heinz D, Baier L, Vössing M, Kühl N. Conceptualizing Digital Resilience for AI-based Information Systems. ECIS 2021 Res. Pap. 6–14 (2021).
Masten AS, Reed MJ. Resilience in development. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.). Oxford University Press, New York (2002).
Hanewald R. Reviewing the literature on ‘at-risk’ and resilient children and young people. Aust. J. Teach. Educ. 36(2), 16–29 (2011).
Finn JD, Rock DA. Academic success among students at risk for school failure. J. Appl. Psychol. 82(2), 221–234 (1997).
Wolin SJ, Wolin S. The resilient self: How survivors of troubled families rise above adversity. Villard Books, New York (1993).
Benard B. Resiliency: What have we learned? USA, San Fransisco, California (2004).
Sacker A, Schoon I. Educational resilience in later life: Resources and assets in adolescence and return to education after leaving school at age 16. Soc. Sci. Res. 36(1), 873–896 (2007).
Javanmard GH, Hossein G. Religious Beliefs and Resilience in Academic Students. Behav. Sci. (Basel). 84(2), 744–748 (2013).
Cannon JT. Experiences of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake: A narrative analysis (Doctoral dis-sertation, Saybrook Graduate School, 2002). Diss. Abstr. Int. 64(4-B), 1938 (2002).
Fredrickson BL, Tugade MM, Waugh CE, Larkin GR. What good are positive emotions in crises? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the Unit-ed States on September 11th, 2001. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 84(2), 365–376 (2003).
Bozkurt A. Resilience, Adaptability, and Sustainability of Higher Education: A Systematic Mapping Study on the Impact of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic and the Transition to the New Normal. J. Learn. Dev. 9(1) (2022).
Watkins PC. Gratitude and subjective well-being. In R.A. Emmons & M.E. McCullough (Eds.), The psychology of gratitude. Oxford University Press, New York (2004).
Engzell P, Frey A, Verhagen M. Learning loss due to school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118(17) (2021).
Wibawa R, Agustina D. Role based education. Equilibrium 7(2), 137–141 (2019).
Hendarsyah D. E-Commerce in the Industrial Age 4.0 and Society 5.0. IQTISHADUNA Our Sci. J. Econ. 8(2), 171–184 (2019).
Syamsuar, Reflianto. Information Technology-Based Education and Learning Challenges in the Industrial Revolution 4.0 Era. Sci. J. Educ. Technol. 6(2), 1–13 (2018).
Fikry M, Anshori M. Globalization Society 5.0 Japan: A Case Study of Google Search Results Outside Japan in 2019. 9(1), 61–82 (2020).
Williams J, Bryan J, Morrison S, Scott T. Protective Factors and Processes Contributing to the Academic Success of Students Living in Poverty: Implications for Counselors. J. Multicult. Couns. Devel. 45(3), 183–200 (2017).
Laila F, Agus H, Sani S, Nur A. Digital Literacy: The Need for Technology-Based Learning. Int. Journals Sci. High Technol. 26(1), 194–200 (2021).
Pocetta G. Digital Resilience: meanings, epistemologies, and methodologies for lifelong learning. Acad. December (2014).
Association EU. EUA 2020: Preliminary Results of the EUA Survey on “Digitally Enhanced Learning at European Higher Education Institutions". (2020).
OECD(a). The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030, (2018).
Jones B, Power A, Gray T, Downey G, Hall T. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice. J. Univ. Teach. Learn. Pract. 13(3), 139–154 (2016).
Predy M, Sutarto J, Prihatin T, Yulianto A. Millennial Generation who are Ready to Face the Era of the Digital Revolution (Society 5.0 and Industrial Revolution 4.0) in the field of education through the development of human resources. (2019).
OCDE. The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030, (2018).
Cassidy S, Eachus P. The development of the General Academic Self-Efficacy (GASE) Scale. Blackpool (2002).
Connor K, Davidson J. Developing a new Resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience scale (CD-RISC). Depress. Anxiety 18(2), 76–82 (2003).
Alva SA. Academic invulnerability among Mexican-American students: The importance of pro-tective resources and appraisals. Hisp. J. Behav. Sci. 13(1), 18–34 (1991).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Open Access
HUMANIS (Humanities, Management and Science Proceedings) is a national peer reviewed and open access journal that publishes significant and important research from all area of agroindustry.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content that making research publish in this journal freely available to the public that supports a greater exchange of knowledge.
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript implies that the submitted work has not been published before (except as part of a thesis or report, or abstract); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors. If and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author(s) still hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions. Authors or others are allowed to multiply article as long as not for commercial purposes. For the new invention, authors are suggested to manage its patent before published. The license type is CC-BY-SA 4.0.
Disclaimer
No responsibility is assumed by publisher and co-publishers, nor by the editors for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a result of any actual or alleged libelous statements, infringement of intellectual property or privacy rights, or products liability, whether resulting from negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any ideas, instructions, procedures, products or methods contained in the material therein.
