Closed-Loop Knowledge Risk Management in IT Company
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/informatika.v6i2.10479Keywords:
Knowledge Risk Management, Knowledge Risks, Knowledge Management, Systematic Literature ReviewAbstract
Today, organizations are surrounded by a volatile environment, which may change at any time and can be a new risk. Therefore, organizations must arm themselves with comprehensive knowledge to be able to deal with the risks posed by an unstable environment. In order for organizations to obtain comprehensive risk information, Knowledge Risk Management (KRM) is needed, which is the intersection of two previously separate fields, namely Risk Management (RM) and Knowledge Management (KM). How can KM reduce risk leading to better risk management? how can the KM process increase RM? and what is the mutually reinforcing integration between RM and KM? To address these questions, the researcher conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) of 42 relevant empirical studies. In order to improve the efficiency of the RM process using the KM process, a knowledge-based risk management (KBRM) process will be used. Utilization of KRM can significantly support the achievement and maintenance of competitive advantage and bring several benefits to software development.
References
Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., Ayar, H., & Okunakol, Z. (2017). Knowledge sharing barriers in software development teams: A multiple case study in Turkey. Kybernetes.
Al-Qatawneh, N. A. W., Al-Tarawneh, S. J., Al-Qatawneh, N. A. W., & Al-Adaileh, R. M. (2019). The Impact of Knowledge Management Processes on Operational Performance as Mediated by IT Agility. International Review of Management and Marketing, 9(1), 36.
Alhawari, S., Karadsheh, L., Talet, A. N., & Mansour, E. (2012). Knowledge-based risk management framework for information technology project. International Journal of Information Management, 32(1), 50-65.
Andriyani, Y., Hoda, R., & Amor, R. (2017). Understanding knowledge management in agile software development practice. Paper presented at the International Conference on Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management.
Asrar-ul-Haq, M., & Anwar, S. (2016). A systematic review of knowledge management and knowledge sharing: Trends, issues, and challenges. Cogent Business & Management, 3(1), 1127744.
Astorga-Vargas, M. A., Flores-Rios, B. L., Licea-Sandoval, G., & Gonzalez-Navarro, F. F. (2017). Explicit and tacit knowledge conversion effects, in software engineering undergraduate students. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(3), 336-345.
Aulawi, H., Ramdhani, M. A., Slamet, C., Ainissyifa, H., & Darmalaksana, W. (2017). Functional Need Analysis of Knowledge Portal Design in Higher Education Institution. International Journal of Soft Computing, 12(2), 132-141.
Bandera, C., Keshtkar, F., Bartolacci, M. R., Neerudu, S., & Passerini, K. (2017). Knowledge management and the entrepreneur: Insights from Ikujiro Nonaka's Dynamic Knowledge Creation model (SECI). International Journal of Innovation Studies, 1(3), 163-174.
Chawan, P., Patil, J., & Naik, R. (2013). Software risk management. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 2(5), 60-66.
Currie, W. L. (2003). A knowledge-based risk assessment framework for evaluating web-enabled application outsourcing projects. International journal of project management, 21(3), 207-217.
Doskocil, R., & Lacko, B. (2018). Risk management and knowledge management as critical success factors of sustainability projects. Sustainability, 10(5), 1438.
Durst, S., Hinteregger, C., & Zieba, M. (2019). The linkage between knowledge risk management and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 105, 1-10.
Durst, S., Zieba, M., & Helio, A. F. (2018). Knowledge Risk Management in Organizations.
Farnese, M. L., Barbieri, B., Chirumbolo, A., & Patriotta, G. (2019). Managing knowledge in organizations: A Nonaka’s SECI model operationalization. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2730.
GarcÃa, J., Amescua, A., Sánchez, M.-I., & Bermón, L. (2011). Design guidelines for software processes knowledge repository development. Information and Software Technology, 53(8), 834-850.
Gotterbarn, D., & Rogerson, S. (2005). Responsible risk assessment with software development: creating the software development impact statement. Communications of the Association for Information systems, 15(1), 40.
Haltiwanger, G., Landaeta, R. E., Pinto, C. A., & Tolk, A. (2010). Understanding the relationship between Risk Management and Knowledge Management: a literature review and extension. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 4(3), 281-300.
Jafari, M., Rezaeenour, J., Mazdeh, M. M., & Hooshmandi, A. (2011). Development and evaluation of a knowledge risk management model for project-based organizations. Management Decision.
Lee, J.-C., Shiue, Y.-C., & Chen, C.-Y. (2016). Examining the impacts of organizational culture and top management support of knowledge sharing on the success of software process improvement. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 462-474.
Liew, A. (2007). Understanding data, information, knowledge and their inter-relationships. Journal of knowledge management practice, 8(2), 1-16.
Mandru, L. (2016). How to control risks? Towards a structure of enterprise risk management process. Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law(09), 80-92.
Massingham, P. (2010). Knowledge risk management: a framework. Journal of Knowledge Management.
Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., & Legese, G. (2019). Method for Conducting Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis for Environmental Science Research. MethodsX, 100777.
Naser, J. I., & Alsalman, H. A. G. (2019). Monitoring software risks based on integrated AHP-ANN method. Journal of Al-Qadisiyah for computer science and mathematics, 11(1), Page 18-26.
Nurdiani, I., Jabangwe, R., Å mite, D., & Damian, D. (2011). Risk identification and risk mitigation instruments for global software development: Systematic review and survey results. Paper presented at the 2011 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Global Software Engineering Workshop.
Ouriques, R. (2019). Understanding and Supporting Knowledge Management in Agile Software Development. Blekinge Tekniska Högskola,
Ouriques, R. A. B., Wnuk, K., Gorschek, T., & Svensson, R. B. (2019). Knowledge management strategies and processes in agile software development: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 29(03), 345-380.
Parente, S. (2018). Agile Quantitative Risk Analysis.
Pimchangthong, D., & Boonjing, V. (2017). Effects of risk management practices on IT project success. Management and production engineering review, 8(1), 30-37.
Pinto, D., Scalabrini, L., de Oliveira, M. S., Urbano, G. C., & Tenório, N. (2017). Validating Knowledge Creation Indicators for the Software Industry: A Field Research Through a Structured Questionnaire. International Journal of Development Research, 7(12), 18030-18035.
Rainer Jr, R. K., Snyder, C. A., & Carr, H. H. (1991). Risk analysis for information technology. Journal of management information systems, 8(1), 129-147.
Regev, S., Shtub, A., & Ben-Haim, Y. (2006). Managing project risks as knowledge gaps. Project management journal, 37(5), 17-25.
Rehácek, P. (2017). Risk management standards for project management.
RodrÃguez, A., Ortega, F., & Concepción, R. (2016). A method for the evaluation of risk in IT projects. Expert Systems with Applications, 45, 273-285.
Rose, K. H. (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)—Fifth Edition. Project management journal, 44(3), e1-e1.
Scott, A. (2002). Your say: Managing knowledge to manage risk. Inside Knowledge, 6 (1). In.
Subashini, R., & Lourthuraj, S. (2016). Tacit Knowledge Externalization. International Journal of Management, 7(2), 646-651.
Talet, A. (2018). The Role of Knowledge Management with Risk Management for Information Technology Projects Risk Assessment. International Journal of Environment and Sustainability, 6(2).
Thanachawengsakul, N., Wannapiroon, P., & Nilsook, P. (2018). How a digital knowledge engineering learning process can enhance technical skills in software engineering.
Vlad, M. P., & Mocean, L. (2019). About Document Management Systems. Quaestus(15), 217-225.
Webb, J. (2007). Risk Management Report: An Essential Tool Kit For Business. FreePint, 222: 20–24. In.
Westfall, L. (2000). Software risk management. Paper presented at the Annual Quality Congress Proceedings-American Society for Quality Control.
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93-112.
Zamanani, N. F., & Izhar, T. A. T. (2018). The Critical Success Factors of Knowledge Repository: A Proposed Framework. International Journal Of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(6).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang have CC-BY-NC or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-NC or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
YOU ARE FREE TO:
- Share : copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt : remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms
