Concurrency Between Police and KPK in Prosecuting and Preventing Criminal Acts of Corruption
Keywords:
Corruption, Concurrency, Prosecuting, PreventingAbstract
This president. The enforcement of anti-corruption laws in Indonesia is one of the efforts to support the nation's economic growth. In this regard, the government has assigned the responsibility for criminal corruption investigations to the police, the Attorney General's Office, and the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). This normative study focuses on the concurrency of authority between the police and the KPK, using various legal literature, journals, tabloids, and other information sources, both print and electronic, for in-depth analysis. The findings from this theoretical examination are as follows: First, at reflecting the ongoing development of corruption crimes in Indonesia, there are still numerous corruption crimes committed across almost all state institutions, both at the central and regional levels. Second, the jurisdictional authority of the KPK and the police, as regulated by their respective laws, is the same at the investigation stage, but the KPK holds broader authority because it can prosecute corruption cases it is handling. Meanwhile, the police (and the Attorney General's Office) can only carry out investigations, and the prosecution must be handed over to the court.
References
Adami Chazawi, Hukum Pidana Materiil dan Formil Korupsi di Indonesia, Bayumedia Publishing, Malang.
Ajip Rosidi, Korupsi dan Kebudayaan, Cetakan Kedua, Dunia Pusta Jaya, Bandung.
Andi Hamzah, Korupsi di Indonesia: Masalah dan Pemecahannya, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Dani Krisnawati et all, Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana Khusus, Pena Pundi Aksara, Jakarta.
J.W.Salamony, M. Yusuf Putra, Suhendar, Optimalisasi Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dengan Tindak Pidana Asal Perikanan, Pustaka Aksara, Surabaya..
Oksidelfa Yanto, Mafia Hukum–Membongkar Manipulasi dan Konspirasi Hukum di Indonesia, Raih Asa Sukses, Bogor..
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Edisi Revisi, Kencana Prenada Media Group,
Jakarta, 2005, Hal. 47, dalam Muhaimin, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Mataram: Mataram University Press.
Satjipto Rahardjo, Sosiologi Hukum: Perkembangan Metode dan Pilihan Masalah, Cetakan kedua, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta.
Ang Prisila Kartin, Kerangka Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Usa Dan Dampaknya, JEMAP : Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi dan Perpajakan, Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata, Vol. 1, No. 1.
Basrifan Arief Bakti, Pemberantasan Korupsi Singapura, Jurnal Sekolah Tinggi Akuntansi Negara, Vol. XX., No. XX.
https://m.jpnn.com/news/rusia-puji-pemberantasan-korupsi-di-indonesia
