Kajian Teoritis Struktur Organisasi Proyek Bisnis

Masno Marjohan; Zulfitra Zulfitra; Siti Nurhalimah; Muhammad Gafar Rasyidi; Jurna Jurna

doi:10.32493/drb.v8i1.46623

Authors

Masno Marjohan Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Pamulang
Zulfitra Zulfitra Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Pamulang
Siti Nurhalimah Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Pamulang
Muhammad Gafar Rasyidi Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Pamulang
Jurna Jurna Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/drb.v8i1.46623

Keywords:

Teori Organisasi; Teori Kelembagaan; Teori Pemangku Kepentingan; Teori Kontinjensi; Teori Transaction Cost Economics (TCE): Teori Sistem Kompleksitas; Teori Perilaku Organisasi; Teori Perilaku Organisasi; Teori Keagenan; Teori Tata Kelola

Abstract

Telah dilakukan penelitian dengan judul Kajian Teoritis Struktur Organisasi Proyek Bisnis. Adapun tujuan penelitian ini yaitu mengkaji secara teoritis teori-teori pendukung dalam penentuan struktur organisasi dalam proyek bisnis. Hasil penelitian diharapkan dapat menjadi masukan dalam penerapan ilmu manajemen khususnya pada ilmu manajemen strategi dalam pembentukan organisasi. Sampel jurnal yang mendukung secara teoritis diambil dari elsevier.com kemudiaan dikumpulkan ditelaah dan diambil yang paling dominan dalam mendukung penentuan struktur organisasi proyek bisnis. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu metode SLR (Tinjauan literatur sistematis). Hasil dari penelitian teoritis ini menemukan bahwa terdapat 9 teori yang dominan dalam menentukan struktur organisasi proyek bisnis, diantaranya: Teori organisasi, 2Teori kelembagaan, Teori pemangku kepentingan, Teori kontinjensi, Teori Transaction Cost Economics (TCE), Teori sistem kompleksitas, Teori Perilaku Organisasi Teori Perilaku Organisasi, Teori keagenan, dan Teori tata kelola

References

Baratta., A. (2006). The triple constraint: a triple illusion. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2006—North America, Seattle, WA. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/triple-constraint-erroneous-useless-value-8024

Chandler, A. D. (2005). Commercializing high-technology industries. Business History Review, 79(3), 595–604. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007680500081460

Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. M.I.T. Press.

Gil, N., & Fu, Y. (2022). Megaproject performance, value creation, and value distribution: An organizational governance perspective. Academy of Management Discoveries, 8(2), 224-251.

Kumar., N., Siddiqui., M. T., & Suhail, M. (n.d.). Theory of Constraints: A Review on its Evolution and Adoption. http://www.ijaema.com/gallery/112-ijaema-september-4587.pdf.

Lamoreaux, N. R., Raff, D. M., & Temin, P. (2003). Beyond markets and hierarchies: Toward a new synthesis of American business history. The American Historical Review, 108(2), 404–433. https://doi.org/10.1086/533240

Lacity, M. C., & Willcocks, L. P. (2016). A new approach to automating services. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(1), 41-49.

Lehtonen, P., & Martinsuo, M. (2009). Integrating the change program with the parent organization. International Journal of Project Management, 27(2), 154-165.

Lundin, R. A., Arvidsson, N., Brady, T., Ekstedt, E., Midler, C., & Sydow, J. (2015). Managing and working in Project Society: Institutional challenges of temporary organizations. Cambridge University Press.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group*, T. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine, 151(4), 264-269.

Packendorff, J., & Lindgren, M. (2014). Projectification and its consequences: Narrow and broad conceptualisations. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 17(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v17i1.807

Parmenter, D. (2015). Key performance indicators: developing, implementing, and using winningKPIs. John Wiley & Sons.

Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. Basic Books.

Schoper, Y., & Ingason, H. T. (2019). Projectification and the impact on societies. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 12(3), 517–521. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-09-2019-288

Söderlund, J., & Tell, F. (2009). The P-form organization and the dynamics of project competence: Project epochs in Asea/ABB, 1950–2000. International Journal of Project Management, 27(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.10.010

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British journal of management, 14(3), 207-222.

Van Wyngaard., C. J., & Pretorius., L. (2012, December). Theory of the triple constrain. A conceptual review. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management- IEEE., pp. 1991-1997

Whitley, R. (2006). Project-based firms: New organizational form or variations on a theme? Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtj003

Whittington, R., Pettigrew, A., Peck, S., Fenton, E., & Conyon, M. (1999). Change and complementarities in the new competitive landscape: A European panel study, 1992–1996. Organization Science, 10(5), 583–600. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.583