Green Innovation Product Performance: Ecopreneurship sebagai Mekanisme Penghubung pada UMKM Berkelanjutan di Kota Tangerang Selatan

Authors

  • Munarsih Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Pamulang
  • Zakaria Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Pamulang
  • Dede Abdurohman Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/drb.v9i5.65108

Keywords:

Ecopreneurship, Green Innovation, Green Product Performance, UMKM Hijau Indonesia, Daya Saing Produk.

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan memahami bagaimana ecopreneurship mendorong pengembangan green innovation pada Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM) berorientasi keberlanjutan, serta bagaimana proses tersebut berkontribusi terhadap green product performance dan daya saing produk di pasar. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus eksploratif pada lima UMKM di Kota Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, yang dilaksanakan selama enam bulan (Januari–Juni 2026) melibatkan sepuluh informan (lima pelaku usaha dan lima konsumen). Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara semi-terstruktur, observasi, dan dokumentasi, kemudian dianalisis dengan analisis tematik mengikuti tahapan Braun dan Clarke (2006, 2021) serta ditriangulasi mengikuti kriteria keabsahan Lincoln dan Guba (1985). Ecopreneurship berperan sebagai mekanisme yang menerjemahkan orientasi keberlanjutan menjadi keputusan bisnis konkret pemilihan bahan, desain, proses produksi, dan komunikasi pemasaran. Green product performance terbentuk bukan semata dari atribut ramah lingkungan, melainkan dari interaksi antara kualitas fungsional, harga, kepercayaan konsumen terhadap informasi keberlanjutan, dan dukungan stakeholder (pemasok, konsumen, komunitas, mitra usaha). Berbeda dari studi terdahulu yang umumnya menempatkan ecopreneurship sebagai anteseden yang diuji secara statistik terhadap kinerja (Afum et al., 2024; Oduro, 2024), penelitian ini mengungkap proses di baliknya secara kualitatif pada konteks UMKM dan startup di Indonesia yang masih jarang dieksplorasi (Rodrigues & Franco, 2023). Implikasinya, penguatan kapabilitas ecopreneur, edukasi konsumen, dan kolaborasi stakeholder diperlukan untuk memperkuat posisi produk hijau dan mendukung ekonomi sirkular.

References

Afum, E., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Baah, C., Acquah, I. S. K., & Osei, M. B. (2024). Empirical evidence of SMEs' ecopreneurship posture, green competitiveness and community-based performance: The neglected missing linkages of green practices. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 19(10), 2691–2711. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-10-2021-1577

Baeshen, Y., Soomro, Y. A., & Bhutto, M. Y. (2021). Determinants of green innovation to achieve sustainable business performance: Evidence from SMEs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 767968. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.767968

Baltaci, D. Ç., Durmaz, Y., & Baltaci, F. (2024). The relationships between the multidimensional planned behavior model, green brand awareness, green marketing activities, and purchase intention. Brain and Behavior, 14(6), e3584. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3584

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications.

Çelik, A. K., Yildiz, T., Aykanat, Z., & Kazemzadeh, S. (2024). Green innovation adoption in Turkish and Iranian SMEs: The effect of dynamic capabilities and the mediating role of absorptive capacity. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16, 1824–1859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01990-1

Cui, J. (2025). AI-driven digital transformation and firm performance in Chinese industrial enterprises: Mediating role of green digital innovation and moderating effects of human-AI collaboration. Working Paper, 1–11. http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.11558

Febrianda, & Dinaseviani, A. (2025). Model of entrepreneurship and digital technology in responding to green and non-green innovation: Case study of batik SMEs in Indonesia. Sustainable Development, 33(4), 5904–5918. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3444

Gangi, F., Daniele, L. M., & Varrone, N. (2020). How do corporate environmental policy and corporate reputation affect risk-adjusted financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(5), 1975–1991. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2482

Gast, J., Gundolf, K., & Cesinger, B. (2017). Doing business in a green way: A systematic review of the ecological sustainability entrepreneurship literature and future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.065

Glasmacher, L., & Ursu, G. (2024). Evaluation of strategic CSR from an industry, resource and stakeholder perspective: An integrative approach. Working Paper.

Gunawan, A. A., Bloemer, J., van Riel, A. C. R., & Essers, C. (2022). Institutional barriers and facilitators of sustainability for Indonesian batik SMEs: A policy agenda. Sustainability, 14(14), 8772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148772

Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014. https://doi.org/10.2307/258963

Ike, C. (2025). Sustainable entrepreneurship in emergence: A systematic literature review. Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70058

Islam, M. R., & Mehdi, A. Al. (2024). Bridging climate awareness and sustainable entrepreneurship: A conceptual framework based on the theory of planned behavior. International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 3(7), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.56472/25835238/irjems-v3i7p129

Jayaraman, K., Jayashree, S., & Dorasamy, M. (2023). Stakeholder engagement and green innovation adoption in organizations. Working Paper.

Kaushik, N., & Dangwal, R. C. (2025). Sustainable entrepreneurship: A systematic review and future research directions. Journal of Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1177/09702385241280810

Keskin, D., Diehl, J. C., & Molenaar, N. (2013). Innovation process of new ventures driven by sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.012

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550

Nguyen, H. V., & Nguyen, C. H. (2018). Green consumption: Closing the intention–behavior gap. Sustainable Development, 26(6), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1875

Novita, D., Hidayatulloh, A. N., Renwarin, J. M. J., Santoso, R., & Mardikaningsih, R. (2022). Relationship between eco transformational leadership, eco training, and employee eco behavior on sustainable corporate performance of SMEs. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 900787. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.900787

Oduro, S. (2024). Eco-innovation and SMEs' sustainable performance: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(9), 248–279. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2023-0961

Otto, S., Kaiser, F. G., & Bonn, A. (2023). Stakeholder perspectives on green product innovation development. Working Paper.

Ramadhani, S. A. P., & Aligarh, F. (2024). Determining factors for the success of green innovation: Technology, organizational, and environmental readiness on the performance of MSMEs in Solo Raya. Proceedings of the International Conference on Islamic Economics, 744–763.

Ren, X., & Mia, M. A. (2025). The determinants of green innovations in manufacturing industries: A systematic literature review. Future Business Journal, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00461-6

Rodrigues, M., & Franco, M. (2023). Green innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): A qualitative approach. Sustainability, 15(5), 4510. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054510

Sari, N., Astari, T. A., Siagian, P., & Kartiko, N. D. (2025). Empowering green innovation: How CEO and firm-level factors shape sustainable business growth in Indonesia. Binus Business Review, 16(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v16i2.13275

Schaltegger, S., Hansen, E. G., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2016). Business models for sustainability: Origins, present research, and future avenues. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615599806

Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.682

Sharma, R., Gunasekaran, A., Sharma, M., Luthra, S., & Joshi, S. (2025). Building a sustainable future: The role of green innovation and green premium in transforming Indian SMEs. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06515-7

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-14

How to Cite

Munarsih, Zakaria, & Abdurohman, D. (2026). Green Innovation Product Performance: Ecopreneurship sebagai Mekanisme Penghubung pada UMKM Berkelanjutan di Kota Tangerang Selatan. Jurnal Disrupsi Bisnis, 9(5), 906–920. https://doi.org/10.32493/drb.v9i5.65108

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.