Peer Review Process

  1. Articles published in JENIUS (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia) are reviewed by 2 peer review.
  2. Journal reviews apply a double blind review system.
  3. 3. Plagiarism screening of manuscripts submitted to JENIUS (Journal of Scientific Human Resource Management) is carried out using an editorial system and reviewers are also assisted by checking on Turnitin and/or Plagiarism Checker X.
  4. Revisions are needed according to the reviewer's suggestions (in the form of recommendations).
  5. In conducting a review, the reviewer considers: the novelty of the topic, objectivity, methods, scientific impacts/implications, conclusions and references. Choose one of the final recommendations, namely:
  • Accept Submission. Receive articles without any revisions given;
  • Revision Required. Provide revisions without having to do a re-review. After the author revises the script, it immediately proceeds to the editing process;
  • Resubmit for Review. Provide revisions and after the author revises the manuscript, it is reviewed agai;
  • Resubmit elsewhere: manuscripts are rejected and suggested to be submitted to other journals;
  • Decline Submission. Reject writing because the quality does not meet the requirements;
  • See comments: revisions are needed according to the reviewer's suggestions (in the form of recommendations).