Effectiveness Of Quality Management System (Qms) In An Efforts To Improve The Performance Of Trademark Examiners At The Office Of The Directorate General Of Intellectual Property

(A Comparative Qualitative Study)

Authors

  • Yustina Linasari Universitas Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan, Banten, Indonesia
  • Denok Sunarsi Universitas Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan, Banten, Indonesia
  • Mukhlis Catio Universitas Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan, Banten, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/iijoms.v1i2.53527

Keywords:

Quality Control System, Trademark Examiner Performance, QMS Implementation

Abstract

This research is a qualitative comparative study aimed at analyzing the differences in quality control systems affecting the performance of Trademark Examiners before and after the implementation of the QMS at the Directorate of Trademarks and Geographical Indications, Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP). The background of this research stems from the need to establish a consistent, accountable, standardized, and solution-oriented substantive examination process in response to applicant complaints. The main issue examined is the comparative analysis of the quality control system for Trademark Examiners' performance before and after QMS implementation and the extent to which QMS impacts the improvement of examination quality and accountability. This study applies an empirical juridical approach with qualitative descriptive analysis techniques. Data were collected through document review and interviews with Trademark Examiners and relevant officials. The results indicate that prior to QMS implementation, quality control was informal and subjective, lacking standard performance indicators. After QMS implementation, quality control becomes more systematic through the use of quality documents, examination evaluation forms, and regular internal audits. However, the effectiveness of QMS still faces challenges such as heavy workloads, limited human resources, resistance to strict evaluation mechanisms, and the absence of an integrated computerized quality monitoring system aligned with the internal systems used by Trademark Examiners in carrying out their duties and responsibilities. The study concludes that QMS implementation has proven effective in contributing significantly to the development of a more structured, objective, and transparent quality control system. Nonetheless, the sustained effectiveness of QMS requires the strengthening of a quality-focused culture within the organization, regular advanced training, and the integration of quality assessment tools with the internal systems used by Trademark Examiners. It is recommended that DGIP continues to develop and enhance a technology-based quality policy that is inclusive and participatory for all examiners.

References

Afandi, 2018, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Teori, Konsep dan Indikator), Nusa Media, Yogyakarta.

Agus Siswanto, dkk, 2023, Analysis of Determinant Factors Employee Performance of Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights Republic of Indonesia, JEMSI (Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, dan Akuntansi, E-ISSN: 2579-5635, P-ISSN: 2460-5891 Volume 9 (6) Desember Tahun 2023, Hal 2493-2498. DOI:10.35870/jemsi.v9i6.1659

Aslami, 2020, Sistem Manajemen Mutu, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, Universitas Islam Negeri, Sumatra Utara.

DJKI, Susunan Organisasi Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual, https://www.dgip.go.id/tentang-djki/struktur-organisasi/direktorat-jenderal-kekayaan-intelektual, diakses tanggal 16 Februari 2025

DJKI, Susunan Organisasi Direktorat Merek dan Indikasi Geografis (https://www.dgip.go.id/tentang-djki/struktur-organisasi/direktorat-merek-dan-indikasi-geografis), diakses tanggal 16 Februari 2025

DeGrazia, Pairolero, Giczy, 2023, Procrastination or Incomplete Data? An Analysis of USPTO Examiner Search Activity (WITHDRAWN), Academy of Management, https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2023.16886

Deming, W. E, 1950, Elementary Principles of The Statistical Control of Quality JUSE, Japanese Union of Scientists and Engineers.

Fahmi, Irham, 2016, Pengantar Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Konsep dam Kinerja. Mitra Wacana Media: Jakarta

Febriyanti, Kusumo Bintoro, 2023, Analisis Critical Success Factors Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual (DJKI) Dalam Layanan Paten, Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, p–ISSN: 2541-0849 e ISSN: 2548-1398 Vol. 8, No. 3, Maret 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i3.11531

G. R. Terry, 2018, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara

Gawang Sudrajat dkk, 2023. The Effect of Motivation and Competence Factors for Improving Patent Examiner Employee Performance, JABM, Vol. 9 No. 1, DOI: https://doi.org/10.17358/jabm.9.1.115.

Hasibuan, M, 2018, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia:Pengertian Dasar, Pengertian, dan Masalah. PT. Toko Gunung Agung, Jakarta.

Ifah, Zulhawat, 2020, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Campuran, PUSTAKA PELAJAR, Yogyakarta.

Kasmir, 2016, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Teori dan Praktik). Depok: PT Rajagrafindo Persada

Koontz, Harold Cyril O’Donnel, 2018, Management, Edition VII. Tokyo: Mc Graw-Hill Kogakusha, Ltd.

Mangkunegara, A.P, 2017, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. PT Remaja Pasda Karya, Bandung.

Marinu Waruwu, 2023, Pendekatan Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Method), Magister Administrasi Pendidikan, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, Volume 7 Nomor 1 Tahun 2023

Mathis, dan Jackson, 2017, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Edisi 9, dialihbahasakan oleh Jimmy Sadeli dan Bayu Prawira Hie, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.

Michael, Melissa, 2020, Are there as many trademark offices as Trademark Examiners? Duke Law Journals, DLJ Vol. 69 No. 8, https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol69/iss8/5

Oksana V, 2020, The risk-based approach in organization quality management systems, Revista Galega de Economía, 29 (3), 6538 ISSN-e 2255-5951. DOI:10.15304/rge.29.3.6538

Radu, Aurel, 2024, An Analysis of the Implementation of a Quality Management System in Intellectual Property Organization, MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS REVIEW 9(1): 204-213 (DOI: 10.24818/mer/2024.01-13)

Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis.

Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Menteri Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 34 Tahun 2013 Tentang Jabatan Fungsional Pemeriksa Merek Dan Angka Kreditnya.

Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan HAM Nomor 67 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pendaftaran Merek.

Republik Indonesia, Permenkumham Nomor 12 Tahun 2021 Tentang Perubahan atas Permenkumham Nomor 67 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pendaftaran Merek.

Republik Indonesia, Permenkum Nomor 1 Tahun 2024, Tentang Organisasi dan tata Kerja Kementerian Hukum

Sadili, 2017, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia.

Sedarmayanti, 2017, Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi, Kinerja dan Produktivitas Kerja, Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Sella, 2020, Manajemen Mutu. linovhr.com. diakses pada 9 Agustus 2023 dalam https://nasonline.id/apa-itu-sistem-manajemen-mutu/, diakses pada 29 Januari 2025

Sidik dan Denok, 2021, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Pascal Books.

Singodimedjo, Markum, 2000, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Surabaya: SMMAS.

S. Sean Tu, 2022, Effectiveness of Examiner Interviews. Landslide, The WVU Law Research Paper, SSRN: http://ssrn.com/link/W-Virginia-U-LEG.html

Sugiyono, 2020, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Alfadeta, Bandung.

Veithzal, 2015, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Perusahaan, RAJAGRAFINDO, Depok.

Wibowo, 2017, Manajemen Kinerja, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta

Downloads

Published

2025-08-29