THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CIRC (COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION) AND RECIPROCAL STATEGIES TO TEACH READING FOR STUDENTS WITH DIFFERENT LEVEL OF MOTIVATION
Keywords:
CIRC, Reciprocal, Motivation, Reading, Learning StrategyAbstract
The objectives of this research are to investigate the effectiveness of CIRC and Reciprocal strategies in teaching reading for students with different level of motivation. The method is quantitative approach. The study is experimental and the factorial design as the research design. The data were obtained by giving pretest, treatment to experimental group, posttest for both CIRC and reciprocal for students with different level of motivation. As the result, there was significant different between CIRC and reciprocal and positive interaction between different level of students motivation. The result of the study revealed that CIRC was effective to teach reading to the high and lower motivation with significances 4.662 > 4.113. also, Reciprocal strategy was effective to teach highand lower students with significances 10.489 > 4.113. There is interaction of motivation and learning strategy in this study.
It can be concluded, CIRC and Reciprocal startegies could be implememted well and it was effective to teach reading for students with different level of motivation. Referring to the result ofthe study, itis recommended that teacher should teach students awareness of using cooperative learning in order to students enjoy and active when learning and teaching process.
References
Cook, Vivian. (2008). Second Language Learning and Language Teaching Fourth Edition. London: Hodder Education. An Hachette Company.
Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Kushman, J.W., Sieber, C., & Heariold-Kinney, P. 2000. This Isn’t the Place For Me: School Droupout. In D, Capuzzi & D.R. Gross (Eds), Youth at Risk: a Prevention Resource for Councellors, Tea Cheer and Parents, (3rd Ed., pp. 471-507). Alexandria Va American Councelling Association.
Lie, A. 2007. Education Policy and EFL Curriculum in Indonesia: between the Commitment to Competence and the Quest for Higher Test Scores. TEFLIN Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 1-15.
Slavin, R.E. 1990. Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice (Second Edition). Engelwood Clift, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Stricklin, K. 2011. Hands on Reciprocal Teaching: a Comprehension Technique. The Reading Teacher, 64 (8).
Tuckman, Bruce W. 1978. Conducting Educational Research. New York: Hartcount Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
Zare, P. 2013. Exploring Reading Strategy Use and Reading Comprehension Success Among EFL Learners. World Applied Sciences Journal, Vol. 22 (11), pp. 1566-1571.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
JPP open access journals all publish articles under Creative Commons licences. For more information, you are advised to visit open access licences page on the Author Guidelines.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Permissions
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere.
For further information including guidance on fair dealing for criticism and review, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions on the Author Guidelines.
