The Effectiveness Of CIRC (Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition) And Reciprocal Stategies To Teach Reading For Students With Different Level Of Motivation

Authors

  • Fitriyah Fitriyah Fitriyah Universitas Pamulang

Keywords:

circ, reciprocal, motivation, reading, learning strategy

Abstract

The objectives of this research are to investigate the effectiveness of CIRC and reciprocal strategies in teaching reading for students with different level of motivation. The method is quantitative approach. The study is experimental and the factorial design as the research design. The data were obtained by giving pretest, treatment to experimental group, posttest for both CIRC and reciprocal for students with different level of motivation. As the result, there was significant different between CIRC and reciprocal and positive interaction between different level of students motivation. The result of the study revealed that CIRC was effective to teach reading to the high and lower motivation with significances 4.662 > 4.113. also, Reciprocal strategy was effective to teach highand lower students with significances 10.489 > 4.113. There is interaction of motivation and learning strategy in this study. It can be concluded, CIRC and Reciprocal startegies could be implememted well and it was effective to teach reading for students with different level of motivation. Referring to the result ofthe study, itis recommended that teacher should teach students awareness of using cooperative learning in order to students enjoy and active when learning and teaching process

Author Biography

Fitriyah Fitriyah Fitriyah, Universitas Pamulang

Dosen di Program Studi S1 Bahasa Inggris Fakultas Sastra Universitas Pamulang

References

Cook, Vivian. (2008). Second Language Learning and Language Teaching Fourth Edition. London: Hodder Education. An Hachette Company.

Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Kushman, J.W., Sieber, C., & Heariold-Kinney, P. 2000. This Isn’t the Place For Me: School Droupout. In D, Capuzzi & D.R. Gross (Eds), Youth at Risk: a Prevention Resource for Councellors, Tea Cheer and Parents, (3rd Ed., pp. 471-507). Alexandria Va American Councelling Association.

Lie, A. 2007. Education Policy and EFL Curriculum in Indonesia: between the Commitment to Competence and the Quest for Higher Test Scores. TEFLIN Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 1-15.

Slavin, R.E. 1990. Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice (Second Edition). Engelwood Clift, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Stricklin, K. 2011. Hands on Reciprocal Teaching: a Comprehension Technique. The Reading Teacher, 64 (8).

Tuckman, Bruce W. 1978. Conducting Educational Research. New York: Hartcount Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

Zare, P. 2013. Exploring Reading Strategy Use and Reading Comprehension Success Among EFL Learners. World Applied Sciences Journal, Vol. 22 (11), pp. 1566-1571.

Published

2018-05-11