PENINGKATAN KEBERLANJUTAN LITERASI SAINS SD: OPTIMALISASI PLATFORM AI SEBAGAI MEDIA STEM LEARNING

Authors

  • Krida Puji Rahayu Universitas Pamulang
  • Ita Handayani Universitas Pamulang
  • Rudi Sanjaya Universitas Pamulang

Abstract

The low level of science literacy among elementary school students in Indonesia indicates the urgent need for learning innovations that integrate technology and interdisciplinary approaches. This Community Service Program (CSP) aims to improve science literacy and teachers’ pedagogical competence through the optimization of artificial intelligence (AI) platforms such as PhET Simulation and ChatGPT in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) learning. The implementation method consists of five phases: diagnostic participatory, intensive workshop, in-class coaching, reflective community, and sustainability evaluation using the CIPP (context, input, process, product) evaluation model. The results show a significant improvement in teachers’ ability to integrate technology into learning (TPACK scores increased from 2.8 to 4.3) and in students’ science literacy (N-gain 0.62; effect size 0.78). In addition, a reflective community called “STEM-AI Teachers” was established to strengthen the program’s sustainability. It can be concluded that the purposeful and ethical use of AI platforms can enhance the sustainability of science literacy in elementary schools while fostering a culture of innovation among teachers.

References

Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2020). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (4th ed.). Pearson

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign

Kasneci, E., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.

Lewis, C., & Hurd, J. (2018). Lesson study step by step: How teacher learning communities improve instruction. Heinemann.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results: What Students Know and Can Do. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Rahmawati, Y., & Khaeruddin. (2022). Pembelajaran Hybrid Berbasis AI di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 6789–6796.

Remillard, J. T. (2025). Teachers’ use of mathematics curriculum materials: Research perspectives on relationships between teachers and curriculum. Routledge.

Rusman. (2017). Model-Model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Rajawali Pers.

Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM Education, STEM Mania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.

Sari, D. P., & Prasetyo, B. (2023). Adopsi Teknologi AI oleh Guru SD di Indonesia. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 15(1), 45–58.

Schön, D. A. (2017). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Routledge.

Villa, R. A., Thousand, J. S., & Nevin, A. I. (2013). A guide to co-teaching: New lessons and strategies to facilitate student learning. Corwin Press.

Wahyuni, S., & Kurniawan, D. A. (2021). Implementasi Pembelajaran STEM di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 7(2), 123–134

Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., & Perkins, K. K. (2008). PhET: Simulations that enhance learning. Science, 322(5902), 682-683.

Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., & Perkins, K. K. (2008). PhET: Simulations That Enhance Learning. Science, 322(5902), 682–683

Downloads

Published

2025-11-01