Pengaruh Keberagaman Gender Dewan Komisaris terhadap Praktik Greenwashing pada Perusahaan Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia

Authors

  • Annisa Alifa Ramadhani Politeknik Negeri Jakarta
  • Lini Ingriyani Politeknik Negeri Jakarta
  • Fajriana Khusnul Khotimah Politeknik Negeri Jakarta
  • Rizqy Ahmad Fadillah Politeknik Negeri Jakarta
  • Azzahra Andika Salsabila Politeknik Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/drb.v9i5.64274

Keywords:

Komisaris Independen Perempuan, Greenwashing, Pelaporan Keberlanjutan, Tata Kelola Perusahaan.

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh proporsi komisaris independen perempuan terhadap praktik greenwashing pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain eksplanatori dan data panel periode 2021–2025. Sampel dipilih melalui teknik purposive sampling berdasarkan ketersediaan laporan tahunan dan laporan keberlanjutan, sehingga diperoleh 32 observasi dari 10 perusahaan. Data sekunder diperoleh dari laporan tahunan, sustainability report, dan publikasi resmi Bursa Efek Indonesia. Praktik greenwashing diukur menggunakan pendekatan disclosure–performance gap, dengan proporsi komisaris independen perempuan sebagai variabel independen utama. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan regresi data panel dengan pendekatan Common Effect Model (CEM). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa proporsi komisaris independen perempuan dan total aset tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap praktik greenwashing. Sebaliknya, ukuran dewan komisaris dan ukuran dewan direksi berpengaruh signifikan terhadap praktik greenwashing. Secara simultan, proporsi komisaris independen perempuan, total aset, ukuran dewan komisaris, dan ukuran dewan direksi berpengaruh signifikan terhadap praktik greenwashing. Nilai Adjusted R-squared sebesar 59,03% menunjukkan bahwa variabel independen dalam model mampu menjelaskan 59,03% variasi praktik greenwashing, sedangkan sisanya dipengaruhi oleh faktor lain di luar model penelitian.

References

Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007

Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2

Byron, K., & Post, C. (2016). Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12165

Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., & Naveen, L. (2008). Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 329–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.08.008

Cotugno, M., Ferilli, G. B., & Palmieri, E. (2025). Does board gender diversity make firms less greenwashed? In Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility. Advance online publication.

Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64

Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106–116.

Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2,000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917

Ghitti, M., Gianfrate, G., & Palma, L. (2024). The agency of greenwashing. Journal of Management & Governance, 28(3), 905–941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-023-09683-8

Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101889

Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI universal standards 2021. Global Reporting Initiative.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Kyaw, K., Treepongkaruna, S., & Jiraporn, P. (2022). Board gender diversity and environmental emissions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 2871–2881. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3052

Lestari, D. I., & Adi, P. P. (2025). Green or greenwashed?: Investigating greenwashing through media, innovation, and governance lenses. Jurnal Riset Dan Aplikasi: Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.33795/jraam.v8i1.007

Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002

Lyon, T. P., & Montgomery, A. W. (2015). The means and end of greenwash. Organization & Environment, 28(2), 223–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575332

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2017). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 51/POJK.03/2017 tentang Penerapan Keuangan Berkelanjutan bagi Lembaga Jasa Keuangan, Emiten, dan Perusahaan Publik.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2021). Surat Edaran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 16/SEOJK.04/2021 tentang Bentuk dan Isi Laporan Tahunan Emiten atau Perusahaan Publik.

United Nations. (2023). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023.

World Economic Forum. (2025). The Global Risks Report 2025 (20th ed.). World Economic Forum.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-25

How to Cite

Ramadhani, A. A., Ingriyani , L., Khotimah, F. K., Fadillah, R. A., & Salsabila, A. A. (2026). Pengaruh Keberagaman Gender Dewan Komisaris terhadap Praktik Greenwashing pada Perusahaan Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Disrupsi Bisnis, 9(5), 952–962. https://doi.org/10.32493/drb.v9i5.64274

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.