Perlindungan Hukum Korban Begal Dalam Upaya Pembelaan Terpaksa Di Tinjau Berdasarkan Pasal 49 KUHP

Authors

  • Anisa Fauziah Universitas Pamulang
  • Yudha Ananta Putra Universitas Pamulang
  • Edy Mulyanto Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/palrev.v7i1.43287

Keywords:

Legal Protection, Victims of Robbery, Perforce Reviewed

Abstract

Not everyone who becomes a victim Robbery is silent and resigned. There are also victims of robbery who make every effort to defend themselves, their property, their honor, and their lives. In an effort to protect himself, someone who fights back by attacking the perpetrator who tries to take his property is a form of defense from someone under compulsion or in the Criminal Code is known as Noodweer. This study uses a type of normative research. The data collection method used in this research is library research. The source of the data in this study is secondary data, namely data obtained indirectly from the source from literature studies that have a relationship with the research object taken in the protection of robbery victims in perforce reviewed. Noodweer is used as a justification, but not as a reason to justify an unlawful act, but rather someone who is forced to commit a crime is forgiven because there was a violation of the law that preceded the act. The causal relationship between attack and mental shock is perforce reviewed, and cannot eliminate the nature of breaking the law, but in conditions of mental shock, it can be a justifying reason or excuse that can abolish the punishment. Legislators must provide more detailed explanations of the articles so that they are more easily understood by the public, besides that it is hoped that there will be an update from the colonial Criminal Code into a new law. In addition, law enforcement officials must be able to pay more attention to the problem of victims with dual status so that legal protection for victims with dual status gets clarity about the rights they deserve.

References

Agung, A. A. G., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Widyantara, I. M. M. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Pembunuhan Begal Atas Dasar Pembelaan Terpaksa. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 2(1), 1–7.

Andriani, A., & Aji, A. B. W. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bagi Korban Kejahatan Begal Yamg Melakukan Pembelaan Terpaksa. Ta’zir: Jurnal Hukum Pidana, 6(1), 1–13.

Bahasa, B. P. D. P. (2016). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia.

Faizal, M. (2021). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN KARENA PEMBELAAN DARURAT YANG MELAMPAUI BATAS (NOODWEER EXCEES). Jurnal Dinamika, 27(1), 2937–2952.

Fajar, M., & Achmad, Y. (2017). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum : Normatif & Empiris. Pustaka Pelajar.

Kanter, E. ., & Sianturi, S. . (2002). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya. Storia Grafika.

Marselino, R. (2020). Pembelaan Terpaksa yang Melampaui Batas (Noodweer Exces) Pada Pasal 49 Ayat (2). Jurist-Diction, 3(2), 633–647. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v3i2.18208

Muchsin. (2003). Perlindungan dan Kepastian Hukum Bagi Investor di Indonesia. Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Muhammad, A. (2014). Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Citra Aditya Sakti.

Saraswati, S. I., Warka, M., & Setyadji, S. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik (ITE) Yang Melanggar Kesusilaan. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 3(4), 5789–5798.

Soesilo. (1988). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal,. Politeia.

Waluyo, B. (2011). Viktomologi Perlindungan Korban & Saksi. Sinar Grafika.

Widnyani, I. A. M., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Karma, N. M. S. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Pembelaan Terpaksa (Noodweer) sebagai Alasan Penghapus Pidana. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 1(1), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.1.1.2007.195-200

Downloads

Published

2024-08-23

How to Cite

Fauziah, A., Ananta Putra, Y., & Mulyanto, E. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Korban Begal Dalam Upaya Pembelaan Terpaksa Di Tinjau Berdasarkan Pasal 49 KUHP . Pamulang Law Review, 7(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.32493/palrev.v7i1.43287

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Agustus 2024

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Pamulang Law Review (PalRev) retain copyright in their published works and grant the journal the right of first publication. All articles are published under the https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/?utm.

Under this license, users are permitted to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), the original publication in Pamulang Law Review is acknowledged, a link to the applicable license is provided, and any adapted material is distributed under the same or a compatible license.

Authors may enter into separate and additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of their work, including depositing it in institutional repositories, personal or professional websites, and other scholarly platforms, provided that the original publication in Pamulang Law Review is properly acknowledged.

Authors are encouraged to disseminate their published works through appropriate scholarly channels to enhance accessibility, visibility, discoverability, and scholarly impact.