Kepastian Hukum Pendaftaran Merek Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Kepemilikan Hak Atas Merek

Authors

  • Susanty Febriyanti Universitas Pamulang

Keywords:

Brand, Legal Protection, Business Actors

Abstract

Brands are a crucial part of the world of commerce. Brands help consumers recognize a manufacturer's products. They serve as a means of identifying the origin of the goods or services they produce. For eyeglass manufacturers, brands serve as a guarantee of the value of their products, particularly regarding product quality. Traders use brands to promote their merchandise and expand their market. For consumers, brands are essential in making informed product choices. It's unimaginable that a product without a brand would be unknown to consumers. Registration of a brand determines the legal relationship between a person or legal entity and a brand as a matter of legal protection for the intellectual property rights of that person or legal entity. The legal relationship between a person and a brand is included in the legal relationship of a person's intellectual property rights which must be protected by the state by providing legal protection to protect a person's rights. Public awareness, both individuals and legal entities, to apply for trademark registration used in goods and or services is increasing from year to year. The increase in applications for trademark registration used in goods and or services is related to the rapid development of economic activities and the high level of business competition among business actors. The very rapid progress of information technology and transportation in the era of globalization allows goods or services produced and marketed in one country, within a short period of time, to be marketed in other countries. By using internet media, marketing of goods or services no longer recognizes time and country boundaries.

References

Yoshiro Sumida danInsan Budi Maulana, Perlindungan Bisnis Merek Indonesia-Jepang, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta, 1994

Sudargo Gautama, Hukum Merek Indonesia, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1989

Harsono Adisumarto, Hak Milik Intelektual Khususnya Paten dan Merek, Hak Milik Perindustrian (Industri Property), Jakarta: Akademia Pressindo, 1990

David Young, Passing off the Law and Practice relating to the Immitation of Goods Bussinesess and Professions, Third Edition, (London: Longman, 1994), mengemukakan “trading must not only be honest but must not even unintentionally be unfair”.

Darmadi Durianto, Sugiarto dan Tony Sitinjak, “Strategi Menaklukan Pasar melalui Riset Ekuitas Perilaku Merek”, (Jakarta: gramedia Utama, 2001)

Khoirul Hidayah, Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, Cetakan Kedua, Setara Press, Jakarta, 2017

Syahriyah Semaun, “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Merek Perdagangan Barang dan Jasa”, Jurnal Hukum Diktum, Edisi No. 1 Vol.14, Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Parepare, 2016

Ranti Fauza Mayana & Tisni Santika, Hukum Merek Perkembangan Aktual Perlindungan Merek dalam Konteks Ekonomi Kreatif di Era Disrupsi Digital, Cetakan Pertama, Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2021

Andre Asmara, “Studi Kasus Penerapan Prinsip Pendaftaran First to File pada Pembatalan Merek Cap Mawar” (Putusan Mari Nomor: 512K.Pdt.Sus.HKI/2016), Jurnal Hukum Syiah Kuala, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2019, hlm.187.

Sudaryat, “Hak Kekayaan Intelektual”, Oase Media, Bandung, 2010.

Andi Saputra, “Mengenal Asas First to File yang Membuat Pierre Cardin Jatuh ke Orang Jakarta”, https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3295968/mengenal-asas-first-to-file-yang-membuat-pierre-cardinjatuh-ke-orang-jakarta, diakses pada tanggal 9 November 2022, pkl. 16.50

Semaun, S. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Perdagangan Barang Dan Jasa. DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, 14(1), 108-124.

Permata, R. R., & Utama, B. (2019). Tinjauan Kasus Tentang Dilusi Merek Di Indonesia Dan Thailand. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 26(1)

Tim Lindsey. (2005). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: PT Alumni.

ertivia, N., Villa, O., Lingga, F. T. V., Patros, A., & Hutauruk, R. H. (2022). Polemik Warkopi vs. Warkop DKI: Apa yang Salah?. Journal of Judicial Review, 24(1), 149-164.

Shahreiza, D. (2011). Sikap Pengadilan terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Atas Merek Dagang Terkenal (Studi pada Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Medan. (Tesis, Universitas Sumatera Utara) Diakses dari https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/34138.

Wijayanti, R. F., Evelina, T. Y., & Budiarti, L. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Persepsi Harga Dan Persepsi Kualitas Terhadap Minat Pembelian Produk Private Label. Adbis: Jurnal Administrasi dan Bisnis, 11(2), 161-166.

Putra, M. D. R., & Disemadi, H. S. (2022). Counterfeit Culture dalam Perkembangan UMKM: Suatu Kajian Kekayaan Intelektual. KRTHA BHAYANGKARA, 16(2), 297-314.

Saidin, O. K. (2004). Aspek Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Arief, I. T. W. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Merek Terkenal Gudang Garam (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 119 PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2017). (Skripsi, Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara) Diakses dari https://repository.uisu.ac.id/handle/123456789/378.

Nevey Variadi Ariadi, “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis di Luar Pengadilan”, Jurnal Rechtsvinding, Vol 1, No. 2, 2012

Rahmi Yuniarti, “Efisiensi Pemilihan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Waralaba”, Fiat Justitia Journal of Law, Vol. 10, Issue 3, 2016

Marwah M. Diah, Prinsip dan Bentuk-bentuk Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan, Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat, Vol 5, No. 2, 2008.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-28

How to Cite

Febriyanti, S. (2025). Kepastian Hukum Pendaftaran Merek Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Kepemilikan Hak Atas Merek. Pamulang Law Review, 8(2), 330–342. Retrieved from https://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/palrev/article/view/55075