About the Journal
Peer Review Process
Journal of Young Electrical Power and Electronics Implementation (YEPEI) receives many articles related to submissions to be published. Thus, peer reviewers accept articles selectively and reject papers that may need intolerable revisions. To be published in the YEPEI Journal, a paper should meet four general criteria:
- Present considerable evidence for its conclusions.
- Clear novelty.
- Distinct significance for scientists in the field.
- Open for inter- or multi-disciplinary studies.
Overall, the acceptable paper should represent an outstanding comprehension that is liable to inspire the development of thinking in the field. There should be a perceptible reason as to why the work deserves to be published in the YEPEI Journal.
The review process
Each submitted manuscript is read by the editorial staff. Only those papers that seem most likely to meet our editorial criteria are sent for full peer review. Those papers assessed by the editors to be of insufficient general interest or otherwise inappropriate are rejected promptly based on internal and external advice from reviewer specialists in the field.
The potential manuscripts to our readership are interested and sent for the next review, at least by two reviewers. The editors then make a decision based on the reviewers' recommendations.
Peer-reviewer Selection
Reviewer selection is essential for the publication process based on many factors, including expertise, reputation, specific recommendations, and our experience with reviewing the publication process. Furthermore, we ensure that the potential reviewers are informed before sending them to review.
Writing the review
The main purpose of the review is to provide the editors with the information needed to determine the accepted manuscripts. The review should also advise the authors as to how they can rewrite for a better paper to comply with editorial requirements. As far as possible, a negative review should explain to the authors the weaknesses of their manuscript, so that rejected authors can understand the basis for the decision and see in broad terms what needs to be done to improve the manuscript. This is secondary to the other functions, however, and referees should not feel obliged to provide detailed, constructive advice to the authors of papers that do not meet the criteria for the journal (as outlined in the letter from the editor when asking for the review).
Anonymity
We conduct a double-blind review so that the authors and the reviewer are unknown to each other. Unless the reviewers feel so strongly to identify the author, nonetheless, we prefer that reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review process and beyond.
Peer-review publication policies
All contributions submitted to the specialists for the education area are selected for peer review. No less than two selected reviewers read the prospective articles.
Publication Frequency
Journal YEPEI published twice (2) in a year (1 volume with 2 number)
The journal is published twice a year (May and November)
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Publication Ethics
Journal of Young Electrical Power and Electronics Implementation (YEPEI) is an electronic national journal reviewed by Mitra Bestari, available in print and online, and published twice a year. The journal follows the guidelines on the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication sourced from COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) in dealing with all aspects of publication ethics, and in particular, how to handle cases of research and publication errors. This statement describes the ethical conduct of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the Author, the Chairman of the Editorial Board, the Editorial Board, Bestari Partners, and publishers.
Editor's Responsibilities
- Editors are responsible for deciding which articles are worthy of publication through editorial board meetings. The editors are guided by the journal's editorial board policies and are limited by applicable legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism.
- In the process of accepting articles, the editorial team is based on the principle of equality of treatment.
- In the process of reviewing journals and making decisions on publications (articles), the editorial team does not discriminate against the author's race, gender, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or political ideology.
- The editor and editorial team will not disclose any information about the manuscript or article that comes in except with the author's permission.
- Manuscripts (articles) that are not published after submission will not be used by the editor's own research and will be returned directly to the author.
Reviewer Responsibilities
The reviewer assists the editor in making editorial decisions on the manuscript/article that enters
- The reviewer is responsible for the recommendations of the reviewed reviewer.
- The manuscript review is carried out objectively and is supported by clear arguments.
- Reviewers are responsible for citations, references, and plagiarism of the reviewed article.
- Reviewers keep information confidential for personal gain.
Author's Responsibilities
- The author must present the article as a result of his thought or research clearly, honestly, and without plagiarism and data manipulation.
- The author is responsible for the confirmation submitted for the article that has been written.
- Authors must comply with publication requirements in the form of originality of the work, not plagiarized, and have never been published in a journal or other publication.
- The author must show references from the opinions and works of others cited.
- Authors must write manuscripts or articles ethically, honestly, and responsibly, in accordance with applicable scientific writing regulations.
- Authors are prohibited from submitting/publishing the same article to more than one journal or publication.
- The author does not object to the desire to undergo editing without changing the substance or main idea of the writing.
Publisher Responsibilities
- The Electrical Engineering Study Program of Pamulang University is responsible for publishing articles that, after going through the process of editing, peer review, and layout in accordance with the rules of publishing Scientific Journals.
- The Electrical Engineering Study Program of Pamulang University, as the publisher, is responsible for ensuring academic freedom for editors and reviewers in carrying out their duties properly.
- The Electrical Engineering Study Program of Pamulang University, as the publisher, is responsible for maintaining privacy and protecting intellectual property and copyright, and editorial freedom.
.png)
