Systematic Literature Review: Tren Penelitian dan Kesenjangan dalam Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Berbasis Kompetensi

Authors

  • Doni Wihartika Universitas Pakuan Bogor
  • Didit Ardianto Universitas Pakuan Bogor
  • Imbron Universitas Pakuan Bogor
  • Prasetyo Kurniawan Universitas Pakuan Bogor
  • Imam Sofi’i Universitas Pakuan Bogor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/drb.v8i3.49237

Keywords:

Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia; Model Berbasis Kompetensi; Systematic Literature Review; PRISMA; Pengembangan Kompetensi.

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mensintesis penelitian terkini dalam bidang Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (MSDM) berbasis perkembangan kompetensi melalui pendekatan Systematic Literature Review (SLR). Dengan menggunakan protokol PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), 42 artikel jurnal internasional bereputasi yang diterbitkan antara 2018-2024 dianalisis secara sistematis. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa MSDM berbasis kompetensi telah berkembang secara signifikan dengan fokus pada pengembangan model kompetensi, integrasi teknologi dalam penilaian kompetensi, dan hubungan antara kompetensi karyawan dengan kinerja organisasi. Penelitian ini mengidentifikasi beberapa gap penelitian, meliputi: (1) terbatasnya studi longitudinal yang mengukur efektivitas jangka panjang dari pendekatan berbasis kompetensi; (2) kurangnya penelitian tentang implementasi MSDM berbasis kompetensi di usaha kecil dan menengah (UKM); (3) minimnya kajian lintas budaya tentang aplikasi model kompetensi; dan (4) eksplorasi yang belum memadai tentang kompetensi yang diperlukan dalam konteks transformasi digital dan lingkungan kerja hybrid. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi penting bagi pengembangan teori dan praktik MSDM berbasis kompetensi serta mengidentifikasi arah penelitian masa depan.

References

Al-Abbadi, L. H. M., Almomani, R. Z. Q., Rumman, A. R. A. A. A., Abu-Rumman, A., & Khraisat, A. M. I. (2019). Impact of human capital development and human capital isolation mechanisms on innovative performance: Evidence from industrial companies in Jordan. European Journal of Business and Management, 11(15), 200-209.

Björkman, I., & Welch, D. (2022). Framing the field of global talent management: Layers, levels and pathways. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(1), 25-54.

Boyatzis, R. E. (2008). Competencies in the 21st century. Journal of Management Development, 27(1), 5-12.

Brewster, C., Gooderham, P. N., & Mayrhofer, W. (2018). Beyond the culture-bound nature of management and organization theory: New directions in cross-cultural research. International Studies of Management & Organization, 48(4), 359-371.

Campion, M. A., Fink, A. A., Ruggeberg, B. J., Carr, L., Phillips, G. M., & Odman, R. B. (2011). Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 225-262.

Chouhan, V. S., & Srivastava, S. (2014). Understanding competencies and competency modeling: A literature survey. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 16(1), 14-22.

Collings, D. G., McMackin, J., Nyberg, A. J., & Wright, P. M. (2021). Strategic human resource management and COVID‐19: Emerging challenges and research opportunities. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1378-1382.

Cooke, F. L., Dickmann, M., & Parry, E. (2020). Important issues in international human resource management. In Handbook of Research on International Human Resource Management (pp. 1-15). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Farndale, E., Thite, M., Budhwar, P., & Kwon, B. (2020). Deglobalization and talent sourcing: Cross-national evidence from high-tech firms. Human Resource Management, 59(3), 259-272.

Gangani, N., McLean, G. N., & Braden, R. A. (2006). A competency‐based human resource development strategy. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 19(2), 127-139.

Le Deist, F. D., & Winterton, J. (2005). What is competence? Human Resource Development International, 8(1), 27-46.

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., ... & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000100.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.

Sparrow, P., & Bognanno, M. (1993). Competency requirement forecasting: issues for international selection and assessment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 1(1), 50-58.

Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work: models for superior performance. John Wiley & Sons.

Stevens, G. W. (2013). A critical review of the science and practice of competency modeling. Human Resource Development Review, 12(1), 86-107.

Ulrich, D., & Brockbank, W. (2005). The HR value proposition. Harvard Business School Press.

Ulrich, D., Younger, J., Brockbank, W., & Ulrich, M. (2013). The state of the HR profession. Human Resource Management, 52(3), 457-471.

Vakola, M., Soderquist, K. E., & Prastacos, G. P. (2007). Competency management in support of organisational change. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 260-275.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-05

How to Cite

Wihartika, D., Ardianto, D., Imbron, I., Kurniawan, P., & Sofi’i, I. (2025). Systematic Literature Review: Tren Penelitian dan Kesenjangan dalam Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Berbasis Kompetensi. Jurnal Disrupsi Bisnis, 8(3), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.32493/drb.v8i3.49237

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.