Party Supremacy in Indonesian Democracy: A Critical Analysis of Unlimited Tenure and Recall Power
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32493/palrev.v9i1.60019Keywords:
Political Parties, Recall, Accountability, Rule of LawAbstract
This study is grounded in the background of the practice of party-led recall and the dominance of political parties in determining the political direction of the state, both of which give rise to contradictions with the principles of constitutionalism and the rule of law. Within the context of Indonesia’s open-list proportional electoral system, the recall mechanism and the absence of term limits for political party leadership constitute anomalies that undermine the principles of popular sovereignty and political accountability. This condition generates a constitutional paradox: political parties are recognized as the principal actors in the formation of public power pursuant to Article 6A paragraph (2) and Article 22E paragraph (3) of the UUD NRI 1945, yet they are not subjected to the same standards of public accountability imposed upon state institutions. The objective of this research is to analyze how the practice of recall and the authoritarian concentration of power within political parties may give rise to constitutional dysfunction and weaken the principles of democratic representation. This study employs a normative-juridical method and a comparative approach by examining Constitutional Court decisions as well as constitutional practices in several democratic states, including Germany and the Netherlands. The findings of this research demonstrate that political parties in Indonesia function not merely as electoral gatekeepers, but also as parliamentary executioners capable of removing duly elected legislators without public involvement. Such a condition produces the subordination of parliament to party elites and distorts the principle of political accountability, which in a democratic system ought to operate vertically between representatives and their constituents. Furthermore, the absence of mechanisms limiting the power of party leaders, coupled with the lack of obligations concerning internal transparency, reinforces the dominance of political parties as private entities exercising substantial public influence. Accordingly, the Constitutional Court should develop and adopt the public function doctrine in order to construe political parties as quasi-state actors subject to the principles of constitutional accountability and constitutional supremacy.
References
Ananda, A. I. “The Influence of Political Dynasty on the Democracy Climate.” Constitutional Law Society 2, no. 1 (2023): 9–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36448/cls.v2i2.37.
Barnes, J. “An Expanding Frontier of Administrative Law: The Public Life of Private Actors (A Functional Approach).” European Public Law 24, no. 3 (2018): 595–612. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2018033.
Billah, M., A. Rahma, and M. Yudha. “Balancing Democracy and Adz-Dzari’ah Principles: Legal Reasoning on Term Limits for Political Party Chairpersons in Indonesia.” Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 2023.
Dal Bó, E., P. Dal Bó, and J. Snyder. Political Dynasties. No. 13122. 2007. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3386/w13122.
Dalton, R. J., D. M. Farrell, and I. McAllister. Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2011.
Dameanti, A. S., R. Mahendra, and Y. V. Oktivan. “Tinjauan Kritis Pergantian Antar Waktu Dalam Dinamika Politik Indonesia: Perspektif Demokrasi.” Civil Officium: Journal of Empirical Studies on Social Science 3, no. 1 (2024): 16–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53754/civilofficium.v3i1.389.
Diamond, L., and R. Gunther. Political Parties and Democracy. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.
Dogra, N. K., and V. Singh. “Democracy and Political Parties.” The Indian Journal of Political Science 75, no. 1 (2014): 17–22.
Dunn, J. “Situating Democratic Political Accountability.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, 329–44. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Erham, E., A. Ma’arij, and G. Gufran. “Diskursus Pembatasan Kekuasaan Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme.” Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum 16, no. 1 (2024): 72–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v16i1.595.
Evendia, Malicia, and Ade Arif Firmansyah. “Degenerative System of Popular Sovereignty by Political Parties Through the Instrument of the Recall Rights.” Pranata Hukum, 2025.
Fikri, S. “Kewenangan Partai Politik Dalam Pergantian Antar Waktu Anggota Lembaga Perwakilan.” Universitas Airlangga, 2001.
Fudin, H. “Aktualisasi Checks and Balances Lembaga Negara: Antara Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Dan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 1 (2022): 202–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1919.
Fuller, L. L. The Morality of Law. Yale University Press, 1969.
Hasrul, Muhammad, Hartono Tasir Irwanto, Imran Eka Saputra, Muhammad Mutawalli Mukhlis, and Mohamed Cheikh Banane. “The Dynamics of The Relationship Between Central and Regional Government Affairs in Digital Transformation: Regulatory Arrangement Towards Smart Governance.” Malaqbi Law Review 1, no. 1 (2026): 97–114.
Hatim, A., S. D. Harijanti, and G. A. Taufik. “The Idea of Presidential Term Limit as an Implicit Unamendable Provision.” Jurnal Konstitusi 21, no. 4 (2024): 542–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2142.
Hilmy, M. I., and T. Marfiansyah. “Recall Referendum Sebagai Alternatif Proses Penggantian Antarwaktu Lembaga Legislatif Di Indonesia.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi 4, no. 1 (2021): 101–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v4i1.4515.
Hine, D. “Political Parties and the Public Accountability of Leaders.” In Elitism, Populism, and European Politics, 121–42. Oxford University Press, 1996. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/0198280351.003.0007.
Ilham, M. “Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menegakkan Keadilan Konstitusional Di Era Modern.” Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 2 (2024): 467–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v8i2.9643.
Jackson, J., and J. M. Gau. “Carving up Concepts? Differentiating between Trust and Legitimacy in Public Attitudes towards Legal Authority.” In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Trust: Towards Theoretical and Methodological Integration, 49–69. Springer International Publishing, 2016. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22261-5_3.
Jurdi, F. Pengantar Hukum Partai Politik. Kencana, 2020.
Khaitan, T. “Political Parties in Constitutional Theory.” Current Legal Problems 73, no. 1 (2020): 89–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuaa004.
Kirk, D. S., and M. Matsuda. “Legal Cynicism, Collective Efficacy, and the Ecology of Arrest.” Criminology 49, no. 2 (2011): 443–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00226.x.
Kudriavtseva, O. M. “The State as a Special Subject of Constitutional and Legal Responsibility.” Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence 5 (2023): 147–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.05.24.
Latansa, Q. D. “Konstitusionalitas Batasan Masa Jabatan Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden Di Indonesia.” Jurist-Diction 2, no. 2 (2019): 595–615. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v2i2.14254.
Mardiana, M., M. M. Hasyim, A. R. Ridha, M. R. Fahlevi, and M. A. Hayat. “Recadoration of Political Parties Preparation of General Elections in the Perspective of Caderization Theory.” International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources 2, no. 2 (2023): 111–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v2i2.31.
Marriansah, A., A. Zarkasi, and M. Amin. “Analisis Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 57 P/Hum/2019 Tentang Pergantian Antar Waktu Anggota Legislatif.” Limbago: Journal of Constitutional Law 2, no. 2 (2022): 216–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/limbago.v2i2.19130.
Muhlashin, I. “Implikasi Penggantian Antar Waktu (PAW) Anggota DPR/DPRD Oleh Partai Politik Terhadap Demokrasi.” Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli 3, no. 1 (2020): 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47647/jsh.v3i1.231.
Mukhlis, Muhammad Mutawalli, Zulhilmi Bin Paidi, and Wiranti. “The Interests of Democracy or the Eradication of Corruption: The Dissolution of Political Parties in a Review of Law and Practice in Other Countries.” Constitutional Law Review 4, no. 1 (2025): 70–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30863/clr.v4i1.5632.
Mukhlis, Muhammad Mutawalli, Muhammad Saleh Tajuddin, Ilham, Koharudin, and Abdul Rahman. “Democratization or Extra-Constitutionalism: Ideas for Limiting the Term of Office for Chairmen of Political Parties in Indonesia.” Jambura Law Review 6, no. 2 (2024): 367–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v6i2.24116.
Mukhlis and others. “Development of Political Parties by the State: From Oligarchy to Democratization in Indonesia.” PETITA: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah, 2025.
Naufal, R., M. Ramadhan, and Muhibban. “Political Dynasties: Threats or Contributions to Democracy.” HISTORICAL: Journal of History and Social Sciences 3, no. 3 (2025): 244–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58355/historical.v3i3.118.
Patra, R. “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pengawal Demokrasi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) 8, no. 2 (2022): 381–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v8i2.51180.
Persson, T., G. Roland, and G. Tabellini. “Separation of Powers and Political Accountability.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, no. 4 (1997): 1163–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555457.
Prabowo, B. S., and W. Wiryanto. “Konsistensi Pembuatan Norma Hukum Dengan Doktrin Judicial Activism Dalam Putusan Judicial Review.” Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 2 (2022): 359–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1925.
Pratiwi, J. I., N. Salama, and S. Ulfah. “Pembatasan Masa Jabatan Presiden Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Rechten: Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia 3, no. 1 (2021): 18–26.
Rahman, I. S., U. Rosidin, and M. A. K. Ramdani. “Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Lembaga Superbody Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.” Qanuniya: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 1 (2024): 35–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15575/qanuniya.v1i1.820.
Ramli, M. A., and G. T. Ardika. “Studi Kritis Terhadap Konsep Negara Hukum.” Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 2 (2019): 132–47.
Rauf, Muhamad Aljebra Aliksan, Marten Bunga, and Hardianto Djanggih. “Hak Recall Partai Politik Terhadap Status Keanggotaan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana 7, no. 4 (2018). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2018.v07.i04.p03.
Riqiey, B., and S. Hadi. “Constitutional Imperatives: Examining the Urgency of Term Limits for Members of the House of Representatives.” Mimbar Keadilan 17, no. 1 (2024): 1–16.
Riqiey, B., A. A. Pramesti, and A. C. Sakti. “Pembatasan Masa Jabatan Ketua Umum Parpol Dalam Perspektif Demokrasi.” Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia 1, no. 1 (2022): 1-17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59066/jmi.v1i1.46.
Ristawati, R. “Pemilihan Umum Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden Indonesia Dalam Kerangka Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensiil.” Jurnal Konstitusi 2, no. 1 (2009): 10–38.
Shubhan, M. H. “Recall: Antara Hak Partai Politik Dan Hak Berpolitik Anggota Parpol.” Jurnal Konstitusi 3, no. 4 (2006).
Siswoko, H. “Ewenangan Hak Menguji Undang-Undang Terhadap Konstitusi Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menciptakan Negara Hukum Yang Demokratis.” Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 11, no. 1 (2022): 94–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32503/mizan.v11i1.2663.
Solum, L. B. “The Aretaic Turn in Constitutional Theory.” Brooklyn Law Review 70 (2004): 475–532.
Sulaiman, B., and Y. Rohaniah. “Analisis Pemilu Dengan Sistem Proporsional Terbuka.” PETANDA: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Humaniora 4, no. 2 (2023): 88–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32509/petanda.v4i2.3319.
Tushnet, M. “Critical Legal Studies and Constitutional Law: An Essay in Deconstruction.” Stanford Law Review 36, no. 2 (1984): 623–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1228693.
Yahya, A. Z., and H. Hufron. “Urgensi Penerapan Constitutent Recall.” Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia 2, no. 1 (2023): 63–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59066/jmi.v2i1.323.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Demas Brian Wicaksono, Sultoni Fikri; I Gde Sandy Satria; Muhammad Mutawalli Mukhlis, Paul Atagamen Aidonojie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Pamulang Law Review (PalRev) retain copyright in their published works and grant the journal the right of first publication. All articles are published under the https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/?utm.
Under this license, users are permitted to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), the original publication in Pamulang Law Review is acknowledged, a link to the applicable license is provided, and any adapted material is distributed under the same or a compatible license.
Authors may enter into separate and additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of their work, including depositing it in institutional repositories, personal or professional websites, and other scholarly platforms, provided that the original publication in Pamulang Law Review is properly acknowledged.
Authors are encouraged to disseminate their published works through appropriate scholarly channels to enhance accessibility, visibility, discoverability, and scholarly impact.
