The Influence of Work-Life Balance and Non-Physical Work Environment on Employee Performance at PT Indah Surya Sakti West Jakart

Authors

  • Ananda Nur Rafli Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Pamulang University
  • Andri Priadi Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Pamulang University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32493/JJSDM.v10i1.64134

Keywords:

Work-Life Balance, Non-Physical Work Environment, Employee Performance.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the partial and simultaneous effects of Work-Life Balance and Non-Physical Work Environment on Employee Performance at PT Indah Surya Sakti West Jakarta. This study employs a quantitative method with an associative descriptive approach. The research population consists of all 70 employees of PT Indah Surya Sakti, utilizing a saturated sampling technique, whereby the entire population is included as the sample. Data were collected through questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive tests, classic assumption tests, multiple linear regression analysis, and hypothesis testing (t-test and F-test) using SPSS version 26. The results indicate that the Work-Life Balance variable (X1) has a positive and significant effect on Employee Performance (Y), as demonstrated by a t-value of 15.908 > t-table 1.996 and a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05, thereby rejecting H0 and accepting H1. The Non-Physical Work Environment variable (X2) also exerts a positive and significant effect on Employee Performance (Y), shown by a t-value of 12.672 > t-table 1.996 and a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05, which rejects H0 and accepts H2. Simultaneously, Work-Life Balance and Non-Physical Work Environment have a positive and significant effect on Employee Performance, with an F-value of 1760.262 > F-table 3.13. Consequently, the regression model is declared feasible and explains 98.1% of the contribution of Work-Life Balance and Non-Physical Work Environment to Employee Performance at PT Indah Surya Sakti West Jakarta.

References

1. Adiawaty, S., & Bernhard, T. (2023). Work-life balance and its implications for employee performance. Journal of Management and Business, 8(1), 10–21.

2. Badrianto, Y., & Ekhsan, M. (2021). The effect of work-life balance on employee performance. Journal of Economics and Management, 2(1), 1–10.

3. Chairunisa, C. A., & Priadi, A. (2026). The effect of compensation and physical work environment on employee performance at PT Bumi Berkah Boga West Bekasi. Scientific Journal of Economics and Management, 4(5), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.65978/jiem.v4i5.173

4. Dwitama, F., & Ariyanto, E. (2024). The effect of work life balance and non-physical work environment on employee performance in the West Sumatra Provincial Regional Civil Service Agency mediated by satisfaction. Journal of Applied Management and Finance (Mankeu), 6(3), 612–617.

5. Gozali, A. T., & Priadi, A. (2026). The influence of non-physical work environment and communication on the performance of employees of the Tangerang City Regional General Hospital. Menara Journal: Human Resource Management, 3(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.65978/jm.v3i1.79

6. Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2021). Human Resource Management (Revised Edition). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

7. Julkipli, A. J., & Priadi, A. (2025). The influence of non-physical work environment and work motivation on employee performance at the Populi Center Foundation, South Jakarta. Scientific Journal of Economics and Management, 3(11), 530–541.

8. Mangkunegara, A. A. A. P. (2021). Corporate human resource management. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

9. Mardiani, I. N., & Widiyanto, A. (2021). The effect of work-life balance, work environment and compensation on the performance of employees of PT Gunanusa Eramandiri. Journal of Sharia Economics & Economics, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.36778/jesya.v4i2.456

10. Nadapdap, B. F., & Harahap, K. (2023). The effect of work-life balance and work environment on employee performance (Study on Grand Inna Medan Employees). Transeconomics, 3(5).

11. Rabani, N., & Budiani, M. S. (2021). Work-life balance as an individual's perception of work-life balance. Journal of Psychology, 8(1), 1–10.

12. Rahayu, S., & Budiman, A. (2025). The influence of the work environment on employee performance based on the perspective of organizational behavior. Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(1), 40–52.

13. Setyawan, A., & Masharyono. (2022). Analysis of Non-Physical Work Environment in Improving Employee Performance. Journal of Office Management Education, 7(1), 15–25.

14. Subagio, A., Supardi, S., & Dharmanto, A. (2024). The influence of non-physical work environment on employee performance through communication at PT. Suzuki Indomobil Motor Plant Tambun II. Journal of Management Science and E-Commerce Publications, 3(1), 199–210.

15. Sugiyono. (2019). Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods (2nd ed.). Bandung: Alfabeta.

16. Suhartini, S. (2021). The Effect of Work-Life Balance and Non-Physical Work Environment on Employee Performance at PT Polychem Indonesia Tbk. (Machinery Division). Eco-Buss, 3(3), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.32877/eb.v3i3.207

17. Sunyoto, D. (2019). Human Resource Management. Yogyakarta: CAPS (Center for Academic Publishing Service).

18. Wulansari, O. D. (2023). Narrative Literature Review: Factors Affecting Work-Life Balance. Psychopreneur Journal, 7(1), 15–28.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-25

How to Cite

Nur Rafli, A., & Priadi, A. (2026). The Influence of Work-Life Balance and Non-Physical Work Environment on Employee Performance at PT Indah Surya Sakti West Jakart. JENIUS (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia), 10(1), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.32493/JJSDM.v10i1.64134

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.